[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Pre-blowback: fucking children is fine if they consent to it

Post-blowback: friends explained to me that it hurts the children and that they can't consent

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

The more snaps you have, the slower your machine will boot. It's uniquely shit technology that should die already.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

sysVinit is only the default, it comes with systemd as well.

The tools are useful no matter the init system, and make life easier, especially for beginners.

In essence MX is just Debian with tools to make desktop use easier.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

The point is that LXQT and LXDE use half as much ram as Xfce. I'm not saying OP should use KDE.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

It's about 300mb lighter than KDE in my experiences. On 2gb of RAM, that makes a difference.

And both LXDE and LXQT use half as much RAM as Xfce.

LXDE is gonna be fine too; but it lacks a lot of the polish that XFCE has. I honestly like both for different things.

I'd rather be able to open more than 5 tabs than have a fancy UI. That's why Xfce is on my newer devices, and I install those 2 whenever someone needs an ancient laptop revived.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Just install a few of them, see what works, how much resources they use up, and what allows you to open more than one browser tab. Hell do it in a VM, Arco-B has a wide range of DE's to choose from in the installer.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

From my experience it's barely lighter than KDE. LXQT/LXDE destroy it in every benchmark and in every test I've tried.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

XFCE I find a little tricky to get tiling working right

Just replace xfwm4 with i3wm for example. That and the fact you can use most Xfce tools outside of Xfce is why it's my favourite.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

WAAAAAAAAAA...

I MEAN, LONG LIVE ROWBOAT GIRLYMAN!!!

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

FOR THE EMPEROR!?!!

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

standards

Also, different solutions have different benefits and downsides, and are better in different scenarios.

21
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

MX Linux, Xfce 4.18

Closing the laptop lid suspends the system, opening it resumes it, but the screen is black. I'm guessing it's related to powerup because suspending through the logout menu and systemctl suspend both work as expected. When it's black, switching to a different tty works, as well as C-M-Backspace to logout.

Same results with both lightdm and sddm, when replacing suspend with hibernate, and I've tried a few solutions like disabling lock on sleep.

Seems like this issue has been around for years, but had a whole bunch of different causes since every other thread has a different solution.

XFSETTINGSD_DEBUG=1 xfsettingsd --replace --no-daemon > /tmp/xf.log 2>&1

ps -ef | grep -E 'screen|lock'

xfconf-query -c xfce4-power-manager -lv

dmesg, cleared it before trying to suspend

updates:

I'm not seeing a black screen, instead it turns on the display and then turns it off.

Additionally, I tried closing and opening the lid a few times, and it woke up correctly.

I tried it in i3wm with the xfce power manager to suspend after closing the lid. It woke up correctly 10 times in a row.

Solution: start an xrandr config and the monitor turns back on.

view more: next ›

Shareni

joined 1 year ago