Skyhighatrist

As long as it continues to be sold on store shelves, it's modern enough to count.

I can't see the name Crash and not think of the 1996 movie with James Spader. Which is weird as fuck.

My bet, A youtuber discovered the game and made videos that did reasonably well in the indie audience, then other youtubers picked up and it snowballed some. I've been seeing more coverage of the game on youtube for a couple of years now.

That game's closer to 20+ years old. It's been a very long time since I've played it. It was way back when gaming on Linux was mostly limited to games that had a native Linux release.

I had a similar problem with one of my displays going wibbly like that every time I rebooted during POST and system boot. Only going back to normal once X started.

When I checked my monitor's display settings when it was wonky, I found that it had the refresh rate set to 14hz and really strange resolution. Turns out it was the display port cable. Replacing that fixed it right up.

Mass Effect 1 has the Mako though. In Starfield, as far as I know there are no ground vehicles at all. So it's just a lot of running.

There are strafing controls, but I think you have to have at least one rank in Piloting the game calls it thrusters. Hold space to enable strafing controls (on controller it's hold RB and then use the left stick to strafe up, down, left and right. I don't know exactly how it works on M+KB.)

There's no flying in atmosphere at all. To do what the parent commenter says would require going back to orbit (loading screen) then choosing a spot on the planet to land (another loading screen). When you land like that on planet, it generates an instance for you that is procedurally generated, but won't contain any of your mission markers. (I haven't actually tried that part, but I've seen others talk about it.)

The game is basically areas, separated by loading screens. You get in your ship, that's a loading screen, you fly to orbit, another loading screen. Then in orbit if you want to go to another planet, you set course and do another loading screen. Once there, you choose a spot and land for another loading screen. There is flying in space, but it's limited to small instances with some other ships, and POIs. Your ship's speed is very slow, ~~and as far as I've been able to tell you cannot walk around your ship while it's in flight (this may be a limitation of the controller controls, I saw a streamer stand up in flight, but I don't know if that was a bug or not. There's no binding to stand up when you are in flight on controller.)~~ I just wasn't holding B long enough, you can stand up when you are in space, you just have to hold the normal binding for longer than I expected.

All that being said, I'm still enjoying the game. But I went in with low expectations.

Looks like sync doesn't implement lemmy spoilers correctly, and still uses reddit spoilers. But the lemmy web-ui doesn't honour those spoilers and does them the way I showed in my comment. That's unfortunate, because people using Sync won't be able to effectively hide spoilers, and will potentially be spoiled on things when Lemmy users use spoilers the way the web-ui tells them to in the editor.

Reddit style spoilers don't appear to work on Lemmy. Instead use:

description
Spoiler goes here

Which will look like this:

Admittedly, it's not ideal for inline spoilers, but if you really want to hide for the benefit of others, that's they way you're supposed to do it on Lemmy, I guess.

I'm also playing Baldur's Gate 3 on my Linux machine. Besides some frequent crashes, which I haven't confirmed if they are the game or my aging hardware, it's been running fine. I'm currently waiting for it to transfer to my Steam Deck to see how it fares there. I'd love to be able to play in bed, but I fear I may lose a lot of sleep if I do that.

They are talking about the remove ads option. It's a one time purchase just to remove ads with none of the additional features of the subscription. As I understand it.