Vilian

But, I may be wrong, please, tell us how exactly a move to systemd has benefited companies enough that it would make the effort and expense to make a distro move to sytemd, let alone a majority of distros, worth it.

you're putting to much thought in something that even the guy who you're asking didn't

that's some high ammount of copium from someone that never made a distro

you can run a command using run0 it's only elevating that commads, sometimes it's needed to login as root, it's life

Idk he's just a hot take merchant basically. He has a particular hate-boner for distros that don't use systemd as the default init system like void and gentoo (usually these are troll tweets as opposed to commit messages though).

shut up, wtf that has todo with the commit, people who don't use systemd it's not going to complain about the color of something that they don't use

exactly lol

no? it an alias to systemd-run, you can call an alias bloated

but with only 1/20 of it's capabilities lmao

the pid1 part is wrong, only the systemd-init run in pid1, in it's own process, own binary etc, it's sole purpose is being an init system, after that it start the rest of the system, including the others systemd binaries

the rest is perfect thanks!, in the lennart he made a comparation with ssh were you "forward the commad to run as root", i think it's a good analogy

. run0 does it in a better way which I do not understand.

it does that in a "ssh like" that i read in the blog, they foward your commands, they don't elevate your user, they also use polkit for security intead of sudoers

run0 uses systemd-run i don't remember you can use that directly

ok them go suffer alone in your 2004 distro that can't update bash because it break the 400 scripts that it use to boot lmao

try winapps