They said they forgot to add the license. I think it's best to give them the benefit of the doubt and believe it was always meant to be open source, even before being posted here.

A knight notices their horse is tired and leaves it at the stables, instead fighting on foot.

Our demon summons involve everyone, regardless of gender and weird look upon first invitation.

You've got make sure you program the time machine correctly though…

Keep in mind that if it is a serious security issue many projects have a way of reporting them separately from other bug reports so the issues can be patched before being published.

Oh wow, I'm curious how they detect spoofed hardware.

I do the same but I recommend starting with dual boot and most people are stubborn and still don't. Two of my friends are interested, one is waiting until they get a new machine. With the other Bitlocker got in the way the first time but now on an older laptop we're going to try arch (it was their request) so I'm excited to give that a try. They are mostly interested because of security reasons, while the other is annoyed with the windows c compilers. It just shows how many reasons there are to use Linux and how difficult it can be in other cases.

There's no way to completely avoid cheaters and I really don't get why there's so many windows games that want Kernelmode access. You could still read the memory and emulate inputs based on that or draw something on the screen. It's probably just causing the cheaters who want to download something and win to get more viruses (which most probably deserve assuming the viruses aren't too bad), while the game company gets closer to being indistinguishable from a virus itself.

Seriously you're recommending Reddit to a Lemmy user?

In the case that mint is the problem perhaps a different distro that is still stable and has a large user base would be good as it makes it easier to get support. I think that's also why those distros aren't recommended to newbies. I started with Ubuntu which worked fine. I think I could've started with most gnome/KDE distros though if they were similarly stable (preferably more). I think having the settings available in a gui was important for my first time.

I have fedora on my laptop personally. Upsides vs windows: More than 5 FPS on the desktop. Boots 95% of the time (the 5% are usually in summer when it likes to overheat if it's vents aren't completely unobstructed), starts in 1 minute rather than five and uses 1-1.5gib of ram leaving me 1.5-2gib (+4gib swap) for apps rather than the 0.5gib or so on windows.

I was ok with windows but frustrated with it's ads and updates. Even back then I liked OSS which I later found out was mostly FOSS and I tried out Linux dual boot on my new computer, I've probably spent 60h on that windows installation and at this point I only have it to change the settings on a usb device that doesn't seem to have Linux support, which I'm considering writing something small for if I figure out how those things work.

Most of those 60h were in the first year and then a couple of hours between Ubuntu and endeavouros, making sure I had my backups even if I couldn't boot into Linux.