[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Technically, containers always run in Linux. (Even on windows/OS X; on those platforms docker runs a lightweight Linux VM that then runs your containers.)

And I wasn't even using Docker.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

How I lost a Postgres database:

  1. Installed Postgres container without configuring a volume
  2. Made a mental note that I need to configure a volume
  3. After a few days of usage, restarted the container to configure the volume
  4. ...
  5. Acceptance
[-] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago
sleep 120 #TODO: actually solve a problem
echo "Sorry, we could not solve this problem."
[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Features necessary for most btrfs use cases are all stable, plus btrfs is readily available in Linux kernel whereas for zfs you need additional kernel module. The availability advantage of btrfs is a big plus in case of a disaster. i.e. no additional work is required to recover your files.

(All the above only applies if your primary OS is Linux, if you use Solaris then zfs might be better.)

[-] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Go: Why is your every second sentence a caution?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

I use rsync+btrfs snapshot solution.

  1. Use rsync to incrementally collect all data into a btrfs subvolume
  2. Deduplicate using duperemove
  3. Create a read-only snapshot of the subvolume

I don't have a backup server, just an external drive that I only connect during backup.

Deduplication is mediocre, I am still looking for snapshot aware duperemove replacement.

akash_rawal

joined 1 year ago