[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Hum, on retrospect, my ISO might be just corrupted. I have never tried to redownload it.

I never know gnome has a image writer tool, and would you please let me know what "dd" stands for?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

recently I have encountered a problem with this, it is indeed not so straightforward to create a bootable windows 10 USB instillation media under linux.

The media created by fedora media writer is not bootable and the media created by ventoy lacks drivers. I was then able to create a media quite easily with the last windows machine in my household. I don't know if it is a temporary bug or fundamental incompatibility.

So I would suggest you to keep a windows installation media at hand in case you need to switch back, or make sure at least one of your friend has a windows machine you can borrow.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

And this is the real game of monopoly, of course.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Sorry, sir, I like shit.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I imagine it wouldn't hurt as much as a whip, but probably equally intimidating.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Dare I ask which country speaks words that cannot be truer.

Edit: saw your instance...

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

巧妇难为无米之炊 -- "even the cleverest house wife cannot cook without rice".

Welcome to the Rice Fields, Motherfucker meme

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E5%B7%A7%E5%A9%A6%E9%9B%A3%E7%82%BA%E7%84%A1%E7%B1%B3%E4%B9%8B%E7%82%8A

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I think you are right, user generated content doesn't seem to be protected. This is surprising to me, as user should hold the right to their content, which in my mind should enjoy stronger protection than personal data.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I am not a lawyer, but I believe in general, yes.

Git is not even that convoluted, as all the history is stored in the .git folder within the repo. Unless there is some convoluted structure built on top, they would only need to move the repo folder to a trash disk, waiting to be formated.

That being said, GDPR is somewhat poorly enforced at the moment, unfortunately. I don't know if you can sue the company and expect some result within couple of years.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I am not a expert or a lawyer, but I believe user actually hold the right to completely erase personal data:

The data subject shall have the right to obtain from the controller the erasure of personal data concerning him or her without undue delay and the controller shall have the obligation to erase personal data without undue delay

https://gdpr.eu/right-to-be-forgotten/

Note the word "erasure" as opposed to "anonymize"

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

User should have the right to delete their data stored by the company.

1
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3
Fairphone 5 Released (shop.fairphone.com)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

With 5 years of OS support and 8 years of security update.

Related threads:

2
Molly v.s. Signal (mander.xyz)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I am not comfortable that signal depends proprietary google library. However, I find that Molly lags significantly behind signal (around 1 to 2 weeks, so maybe not as significant as I thought), but I am just concerned that if there is a security fix in signal, molly will not be able to react as fast.

I am also quite frustrated with the general lack of communication from the signal team (for example the lack of communication regarding username). I doubt they will have the good will to help molly when there is a critical security fix.

It is frustrating that signal no longer seems like the gold standard for privacy any more; unfortunately, all my friends are on there (ironic, isn't it...).

1
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Secure camera is really good. However I find google camera works better in low light with fast moving object, like in door photo of moving pet etc.

For my use case, I have to install GCAM on my main profile, since my wife like to use it; and I don't want to go through the hassel of transferring photos between profile. But of course, I denied internet access and setup storage scope for GCAM.

But that left me wondering, am I just making my life harder by using secure camera as default? Since it seems that although secure camera is pretty good, it is not as optimized as GCAM. I already have GCAM on my phone, so I cannot think of any privacy benefit by not setting it as the default.

What do you think? do you use GCAM or secure camera, and why?

view more: next ›

baseless_discourse

joined 1 year ago