conneru64

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I literally just described the scientific method. Sure, it's not the kind of question most scientists would ask, but it's the same scientific method.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

IPv6 might work

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm gonna go look at cat pictures now

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I don't want to hear about the murderous CEO!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Hypothesis: adding this part or doing that thing will make it do what I want.

Experiment: do that change and see if it does the thing you want.

If it doesn't do what you want, go back to hypothesis step. If that's not science, idk what is.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is 31° positive or negative?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

It bugs me that people will call anything with a positive second derivative "exponentially increasing". I can do one better: it increases busy-beaver-y! Is that fast enough for people??

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Then projects would just not update to the new standard, pretty easy solution. Is webp even changing anymore?

And how would Google start collecting license fees? They already give away this IP, so they can't just undo that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

What are they gonna do, add proprietary extensions? Nobody will support those. It's open, and it only works by being open. It's actually in Google's interests for it to be open, widespread, and an effective format because it saves them bandwidth and improves UX on their actual proprietary stuff like YouTube.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You might not have a choice if they all decide to do it. Companies are actually kinda good at that kind of collective actions sometimes.