dactylotheca

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Thank fuck this is no longer the case – the "non-smoking" sections were usually just 2nd hand smoke sections

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Uh, define "working"?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I've had a conservative say essentially that to me but with a straight face. He was also convinced that white, cishet meat eater men are the most oppressed minority (literally what he said).

Parodying conservative opinions is completely impossible nowadays; any quip anybody can come up with will be an actual conservative opinion, pretty much no matter how ridiculously stupid it is.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 7 hours ago

Yes because it's literally impossible to not use some services or products because you don't want to support their makers, because for some reason that means you can't use anything else either.

I've got a sneaking suspicion you just don't like people disagreeing with views that you share

[–] [email protected] 123 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Ah the two genders, male and political

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Every time somebody says something like "I could have done that" (especially if they're being dismissive of somebody's achievement), it brings me great pleasure to say "but you didn't."

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

If you want to protect your privacy against viewers of your videos, how you upload them to YouTube makes more or less no difference. With this scenario the question is how much information are you leaking in your content, and that'd cover everything from writing style idiosyncracies to anything that can be used to potentially identify eg. where you live and so on.

If you're worried about "malicious hackers", then the question is who are these potential hackers you're protecting against? Would they be attacking Google or you? If it's you, then how you upload things to YT is again completely meaningless. If they're attacking Google and get far enough to actually exfil data, what they'd actually be able to get out of it is anybody's guess. Using a VPN and a throwaway email is probably good enough in any case.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Who are you protecting your privacy against here?

Because if it's Google, then why on earth would you want to upload content to YouTube in the first place?

OK, let's say you didn't give them your phone number and masked your voice. If you're not connecting over a VPN or something like Tor, they still have your IP address.

OK, you now use a VPN, but your browser can still be very effectively fingerprinted and that fingerprint could be nearly unique.

And so on and so on. And this isn't even going into metadata in & about your video files that could be used to fingerprint the system they were done on.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You better not be gearing up to go all Deliverance on us with that story

[–] [email protected] 241 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Ah, good idea putting the fire in the tent, that way the fire will stay warm

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I think that's just IT jobs in general. I noped out after 15 years, no fucking clue what I'll do but I can tell you it'll be anything but IT

 

cross-posted from: https://suppo.fi/post/2748587

view more: next ›