devils_advocate

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Your /S wasn't loud enough. Next time try /S

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

... Aww. Why did the story stop?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Familiarity breeds attempt.

Jane Sherwood Ace

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

One inaccuracy in a historical report allows detractors to call the whole thing a lie.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM X 100

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Still not sure why you are so adamant about giving $5 a month to a monopoly generating 30bn per year. But you be you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The difference is 45% of $12 and your original goal at the top of this thread was to support your content creators, not YouTube.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (5 children)

"The YouTubers" not your YouTuber.

Better just to split $7 a month between your favourite patreon accounts and put up with some advertising.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (7 children)

That's an ok justification, but I thought you were buying YouTube premium to support your content creator, not to support YouTube. YouTube premium doesn't support your content creator.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe the amazing women chess players just have better things to do

https://en.chessbase.com/post/what-gender-gap-in-chess

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (9 children)

What I mean is that paying for YouTube premium is a very indirect and inefficient way to support your preferred content creator.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (11 children)

On the other hand, YouTube is also supporting some content creators you hate...

... But at least you don't have to watch them.

view more: next ›