You could try VanillaOS 2.0 Beta which is a Debian-based immutable distro, planned for final release later this year.
That’s kind of true, but MacOS and Mac OSX are 2 different things
Then Windows 3.0 and Windows 11 are two different things, so by that metric you can't include Windows either.
all the way from 1991 to 2024, I think the only other OS that has managed that is Windows
It's easy to forget about MacOS when it only has 15% desktop market share.
Operating systems that started before 1991 that are still in active development (had a release in the last 12 months):
- Multics (1969-)
- MVS (1974-) via OS/390 (1995-) -> z/OS (2001-)
- VMS (1977) via OpenVMS (1992-)
- BSD (1978-) via 386BSD -> FreeBSD, NetBSD -> OpenBSD
- HP-UX (1982-)
- SunOS (1982-1994) via Solaris (1992-)
- MacOS (1984-)
- AIX (1986-)
- RISC OS (1987-)
Almost made it:
- Minix (1987-2017)
- Genera (1982-2021)
- AmigaOS (1985-2021)
- NeXTSTEP (1987-1997) via GNUStep (1993-2021)
- IBM i (1988-2022)
- SpartaDOS (1988-2022)
I think the post is supposed to link here: https://timemachiner.io/2022/06/18/windows-95-launch-video-reminds-us-how-90s-the-90s-were/
For some reason when I view the post it just links to a jpeg
He was in the airport, remember. Not in a local market.
I lost my earbuds in a remote town in Chile, so tried buying a new pair at the airport before flying out.
...
True Apple lightning devices are more expensive to make.
...
I wish @Apple would devote an employee or two to cracking down on such a technological, psychological abomination as this.
He wants to take away a budget option from developing countries where people can't afford the expensive version of the proprietary technology, and he wants Apple to be the one to do it?
Fuck this guy.
Why not post your blogs to a fediverse platform? Do they need to be on a separate hosted system? You'll probably get more people reading and engaging with your posts if you are just posting to a Mastodon instance rather than hosting on a separate web platform and hoping that people stumble across it.
I didn't even mention Github, I just quoted from the video description.
a really odd way of using Git
Git was literally designed for kernel development.
What do you mean by security? Secure from whom?
There are of course different attributes of an OS design that affect different aspects of security depending on your threat model.
Are your application programmers malicious, or is all application code trusted? Are your users malicious or are they trusted? Do you need to guarantee physical security of the device? Is the device manufacturer malicious? etc.
Different threat models will result in designs that optimize for different types of security. Console OSes for example will tend to be designed around copy-protection of the software, assuming the user is malicious.
I've been using Firefox since the beginning, before that Mozilla, and before that Netscape Navigator.
But I think it's finally time to switch to Librewolf.
I don't want digital advertising of any kind, even if my privacy is "preserved" through fancy data-laundering.