[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Bad clickbait headline.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Depends on what your language's script is then with assigned Unicode characters, how wide-spread it is, when fonts will support the glyphs, and what you mean by "changes to be available on my local OS". What OS? What does available mean here? Do you expect the OS UI to be in your language? Doubtful. Some desktop environment maybe somewhen. Programs using ICU are more likely to support specific script related features (e.g. word/line breaking, transliteration) when ICU will support Unicode 16 in its next version. Locale specifics may have to wait for or could be contributed to CLDR that is also used by ICU. Availability of any UI in the language mostly depends on whether translators contribute to the relevant projects.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They are "looking for a more private" client. With the centralized Discord service that does anything it wants with any message there is no such thing.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Whatever client you use, there is no privacy with Discord. Period. Full stop.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Hell no, having OTP in the browser kinda defeats all 2FA and makes it 1FA again.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I heard good things about Geany.

erAck

joined 1 year ago