[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

It's GPT-4 to tell the truth.

Not sure it'll do the tasks you list at the start but it's the front runner.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nice try copper.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago

what a good little bit of art

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Portugal had nothing on the line, twas in effect a friendly like when Cameroon beat Brazil in the World Cup

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I mean, if the bias was based on skin-colour or sex, would you feel differently about it?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No, because it’s circular logic.

It is, and that's inherent in the problem under consideration, the problem of the 'uncaused caused' or the 'first mover'. Logic can either be A) circular or B) not-circular. Any not-circular logic must explain each element by referring to a prior, but then you've got an infinite regress. So you're trapped in a dilemma: do you want the circular logic or the infinite regress? Liebniz's choice was to say that God was inherently existent, like when Lao Tzu said 道法 自然

There’s no reason for a necessary being to exist before it does

Correct. It is necessary: it is self-causing. It does not stand upon a 'reason', unlike everything else in conditioned existence.

to exist before it does

You're assuming it is subject to the laws of linear time and causation, and point out how that assumption leads to a contradiction. But Liebniz's God is not subject to the laws of linear time and causation. Which is the whole point of positing it: because if it were subject to those laws: infinite regress.

and no evidence that one does in the real world.

Well the world exists, so all this existence must have some cause. That was the starting point of the conversation: Why is there something instead of nothing?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

I was complaining about this on [email protected]

About 10% of pop culture stories, maybe more, are about billionaires. Are 10% of people billionaires?

And even in a medieval fantasy settings, it's about gold-decked kings: the billionaires of the setting.

It's to perpetuate a class bias.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well Liebniz said it's because of a necessary being bearing the reason for its existence within itself, if that helps.

-47
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
45
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
66
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
31
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

bonus points for rare/unusual ones

1
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
0
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

And I'd like to be able to do it privately too, that'd be cool.

Things I can do –

  • write HTML and CSS
  • register a domain and set up hosting
  • use Filezilla

Things I don't know how to do –

  • Create databases, I always had someone around to do that for me
  • Self-host
  • Set up an onion site 🧅
  • Set up an eepsite
  • Register a .bit domain

I am more of a content gal than a tech gal, but think of all the cool stuff I could create if I could spin up anonymous websites in a few hours.

0
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
214
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

They were invented decades ago.

They have fewer moving parts than wheelbois.

They require less maintenance.

There's obviously some bottleneck in expanding maglev technology, but what is it?

120
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It's discrediting valid concerns against card-payments. It's invalidating how great cash is.

It's when the worst person you know makes a good point.

And things now are so Culture-Wars-y, nobody makes solid analyses any more, that when the far-right say cards are bad, everybody jumps to thinking cards are good.

view more: next ›

frightful_hobgoblin

joined 11 months ago