ganymede

joined 3 years ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

cos nothing proves "microsoft <3 opensource" like releasing a project over ⅓ of a century old

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

i agree with everything you've said including your links between causation etc

except the final link you make that its the consumer, i note you said 'partly' a consumer issue, so its not a full attribution - perhaps i'm misinterpreting what % you're attributing.

tbh my take is alot of people would like an option between paying $2 for a garment they know involved exploitation/slavery vs an accessible^1^ independent option that doesn't cost $500/garment.

i don't think people are still choosing the $2 option because they're ok with slavery. but (tragically?) they're more ok with someone else being the slave vs them being the slave - which is what they'd basically be if every piece of clothing cost them $500.

and i think we know the reason there's very little accessible options in between is because the game is rigged, you (HelixDab2) can't realistically enter the game without serious capital behind you (ie. wealth/connections) to reach the volume prices which might give us an option in between - the market isn't fair, its been stitched up long ago, by the same people who don't produce anything and greedily skim off the top.

the venn diagram of independent designers fairly charging $500 for their labor and the greedy skimmers getting fat without producing anything themselves is two separate circles - they're worlds apart

^1^ Quick note on accessibility, there are ofc some scant options between $2-500, but what isn't clear (ie. readily accessible) to the consumer is which of those options isn't just some greedy bastard buying a $2 option and selling it on for $15.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I love the way you think.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

In other words its not because of the consumers, but because of the greedy skimming off the top.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

have you checked out freecad?

for the pricetag ($0) i'm pretty impressed

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

great news, openai keeps getting more open by the minute

/s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

they're just projecting their own tactics on you.

they're the one moving the goalposts with that laughable brad pitt bs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

the mental gymnastics you go through to parrot corporate propaganda is honestly just astonishing

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

its not the actual money laundering they object to.

it's that they didn't get a cut.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

if you wanna continue to embarrass yourself go ahead. i won't be entertaining this sad display any longer.

anyone is free to search the thread and read what i wrote in the full context it was stated.

and to see your blatant dishonesty.

good luck mate, i hope you find some kind of peace to whatever is keeping you so fixated about windows users that you need to fabricate an enemy in me over that aspect, despite me clearly and repeatedly denouncing it from day 1 of this discussion. all the best.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

and for the record i don't think its about 'inadequacies'. its not a magic skill or secret knowledge. its just about investing the time to learn. put the time in and it will come, as you've already seen with your server.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

nowhere in this entire essay, nor in any of your other comments for that matter, do you even address my point that lumping in Windows users with the immoral actions of a company results in a harmful dissonance

anyone can see the scrollback for themselves, it's plainly visible i denounced it multiple times. the evidence is right here for anyone to see:

But then you learn they got rich by cutting corners and screwing over your friends. And are actively investing in making the public pool shit so they can grandstand their pool. Noone is blaming you for going up to the rich guys pool to have a nice easy time. Or at least, I’m not defending the kind of linux zealots who might blame you for choosing that

Source

As I mentioned, I’m not here to criticise you for making the choice you have, or defend those who do criticise you for it.

Source

As stated we are not listing reasons for condemning you for your choice

Source

As stated many times, you are welcome to your choice, and your choice is understandable.

Source

dude its just sad at this point. why are you bothering to pretend its not addressed when its addressed repeatedly and was even requoted like 2 posts before you made your ridiculous, verifiably false statement.

what is the purpose of this game? who do you think you're kidding? anyone can see you're being dishonest. and don't even have the grace to admit it, you're wrong. completely wasting an opportunity for us both to learn and for us to be friends even.

whats even stranger is the original discussion was about linux community shitting on windows NOT windows users:

The Linux community shitting on Windows is worse

Source

you've fixated on this windows user issue when, as quoted, it was never even about that, was already denounced by me immediately as quoted & sourced repeatedly above.

i can see why you think linux users are smug arseholes, you pull this shit and cry when you don't get away with it. its just sad dude. noone at microsoft is paying for your time to get invested like this. you think you give a fuck about you???

but you know who might actually give a fuck about you? us, here, in this community. but you need to start by being honest with yourself about this, otherwise you are the one making it a waste of time.

view more: next ›