gencha

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

As long as it passes tests and CI, people will commit and push almost any kind of garbage it produces. I do the code reviews, and it turned into a circus after LLMs. People are extremely reluctant to fix "their code", because they don't understand it, and they also don't want to go back to basics and learn the fundamentals they were trying to skip by using the LLM in the first place.

I can't see anything positive about this development.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

I don't think they need help from worse war criminals. So, yes, please fuck off and go home.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, I agree. Just wanted to say I get the idea, but Google likely can't be trusted with implementing a solution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

TLS and this proposal are different though. We don't usually use client certificates with HTTPS. They are proposing something similar though. They want a way to attest the client. There's really a ton of bot traffic on the web, and these bots are not browsers, and which is the reason we all solve CAPTCHAs. I get the idea, but I'll support Mozilla's stance on the subject.

view more: ‹ prev next ›