gxgx55

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think you're putting words in my mouth, never did I imply or think that Ukraine is responsible for what is happening, or that Ukraine is not right in wanting all their territory back. However, it is factual that if Ukraine wants to secure its territory, which is entirely justified, it will not be by means that are describable as "peace" or "peaceful", because russia is not backing down like complete idiots(a common theme).

Is what I am saying false?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Fair enough. I guess I've spent too much time seeing disingenuous calls for "peace" on the internet, mostly by pro-russia shills, with the intent of painting the western support of Ukraine as evil warmongering or something.

We do wish for peace ultimately, but there's a whole lot of violence to happen if it is going to be on Ukrainian terms, because russia does not look like it wants to back down.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Considering the Ukrainian position is basically "any loss of territory is unacceptable", there is little room for both peace negotiation AND support for Ukraine simultaneously. Tough position.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

but working in tech I just know there's no such thing as "online gambling".

I wouldn't call pseudorandomess(if that's what you're implying) as disqualifying something from being gambling - it only needs to be random enough with an even distribution.

If instead you're talking about odds being slightly in favor of the house then... that's literally no different than gambling irl either. At which point, I have to question what you even define as "gambling".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I... am?

What is this, I am against dictatorial abominations, so that means I am in favor of capitalist abuse? I am literally saying that opposition to capitalism is shooting itself in the foot by tolerating the existence of authoritarian "communists".

Unless you're an actual tankie, your words towards me make no sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Poorly, but not worse than a dictatorship(such as the USSR).

What's your point?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, I'm just saying tankie infestations are so widespread and loud that they have a decent amount of leverage on what the average person thinks of communism, and tankie opposing leftists are either not loud enough, or not numerous enough.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Failing to account for greed for power some people have is in itself a fatal flaw, to be honest. Anyone who advocates for the exact same actions and glorifies the USSR knows what they are doing, they're hoping to come out on top after their desired revolution. Unfortunately, there are plenty of those kinds of people on this platform...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It doesn't, but in this thread's we see a simultaneous claim of "We aren't tankies, of course Stalin and Mao are not good examples of communists" and "Eastern european people were better off under the USSR". Of course, I don't think the same people are making both claims, but just the fact that some people can claim the latter and not get collectively shunned is indicative of a huge problem in leftist spaces, it's disgusting frankly. Tankies are significant force, at least partially representing leftism to everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Sure, but the meme refers to the communities on the internet that unironically go full tankie, praising Stalin and Mao.

Worst of all, tankies tend to inflitrate sane leftist spaces and slowly transform them. I've witnessed it many times, and that just makes me think that Marxists-Leninists are just the most dominant form of leftism on the internet, which is horrible.