[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Was that the first version Nexus 7? I had the refreshed version and it was my favourite bit of tech ever. I ran it for about 5 years until the screen and battery both died. I loved that thing.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

No 0-60, you would die trying. Even 40 mi/h is over ambitious. Clearly, the 2CV was spawned by Satan to destroy our will to live. I see no other reason for that many sales.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

There were so many better options that I can't even grant you a nod in this direction.

Nil points, yellow card, etc.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

If memory serves, I think at least some versions of the Allegro had reasonably comfy seats. I'm afraid that can't be said of the 2CV.

Also, the use of a "double skin" body, dropped by almost every manufacturer a decade or so before the Allegro, is really just another amusing tidbit we can taunt it with.

There absolutely nothing even faintly comic about the 2CV, it is an abhorrence at every level.

But I'll grant you, the Allegro is definitely in the top 10.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

The Citroen 2CV.

There are many cars that have something worse; three wheeled things, Tesla design, the Renault dash mounted gearstick, etc.

But there is no other "modern" car which so significantly fails in every way as the 2CV.

It has nothing that could be described as performance or ride or comfort. There is nothing about it that can be called practical or stylish. It has zero properties that any sane person could find desirable in a car.

It's so bad that even the Trabant has less to damn it, and that really is terrible.

I think the best evidence that the 2CV is man's biggest failure, should you really need any, is that you are more likely to see them in the country they were made, repurposed as a chicken coop.

If that's not the ultimate failure, I don't know what is.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

You're being way too pedantic. I said most home hifi and you're example isn't.

If you want me to be more specific, this article will cover pretty much anything you want know.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Not really. Most home hifi won't be affected. I think that's a reasonable generalisation.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago

Powered, as in active? No, those are connected internally. Cabling is then between the internal amp and a preamplifier, which is line level.

I would point you to the overwhelming lack of any reported incidents of speakers or amplifiers catching fire because the wires were too thin. This is simply fiction.

Coat hangers are generally much wider than any speaker wire, and the metal used makes little to no difference to the sound or the load. It is of no importance, you can do this safely.

As I've said, there are a few scenarios where you could run into problems, but these are very much outside of home hifi.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Username checks out! /s

No, they'll be fine. And if they are connected reasonably well, will sound as good as any other speaker cable.

Of course, there are one or two scenarios where that can change, but for most people they aren't applicable.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Well done, that's more than some do for actual production work!

[-] [email protected] 74 points 6 days ago

I don't know how well known this is by now, but just in case, I'll add it.

The quality of your speakers is not affected by the cable from your amp.

The connectors are more important in terms of physical contact, but almost any new connector will do. The wire itself makes no difference. Pay as much as you want but the sound will not be any different than if you used metal coat hanger wire.

32
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Hopefully, very.

view more: next ›

ianovic69

joined 1 year ago