No they give them lots of money so they can be used as propaganda, like that lady that claimed NK moved trains with people and ate mud.
ikilledtheradiostar
joined 3 years ago
It's in the article.
spoiler
How is your reading comprehension so poor?
They literally have a graph showing their paris accord goal as of now, where they as of now, and a 1.5c goal. They and India are ahead.
Also
China’s emissions are nearing their peak, years ahead of when China’s government had pledged to reach that goal.
Every country has different pledge responsibilities it would be drastically unfair to ask more of developing countries to reduce at the same rate as non, especially taking into account the looting the west has done and the offshored emissions on their behalf.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/11/08/climate/cop27-emissions-country-compare.html
New York times reported China is ahead of pledges
They even use the same dumbass fallacy images. That is so sad and lame.
🐷 💩 🥎
Lol your mind sure is something.
spoiler
Person is in bad faith and worse, smug. Hhit em with a PPB.
Once again they were given a choice between becoming a state or remaining a territory. Not for independence. It'd be like offering a scrap of bread to a starving man in exchange for the man legitimizing your ability to keep him malnourished.
The ole adage of "the only thing worse than being exploited is not being exploited " comes to mind.
Since you can't be assed to read your own damn wiki article I assume you're just in bad faith.
The choice was to become a state or remain a territory. Either yes or no would have had Hawaiian peoples occupied. Statehood could be seen as a regaining a scrap of self determination but all it ended up doing was impoverishing the natives and ceding all wealth to colonizing capitalists. This is a primarily function of bourgeois democracy.
I've tasted all their piss and it all tastes the same.
Same. The cth discord is absolute garbage.
That's a wook.
Tankie Is a guy that likes propane over charcoal.