koper

"A brief search showed that the applicant gave false statements in their VISA application form, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1546. Lifetime ban applied."

If you turn the fan up high enough it will blow the heat from outside into the house. Trust me, I'm a scientists.

Why not?

What about the centuries of imperialism here and there

Communication network providers in the EU generally aren't liable for illegal activity of their users.

The DPC is almost certainly going to ignore complaints like this. You can choose between suing meta or suing the DPC.

DPAs don't have the resources to take action on every single complaints. You can sue the controller or processor directly under article 79 if you want to be sure that an issue gets dealt with quickly.

Using a VPN does exactly nothing against cookies or device fingerprinting.

The grand passant

For the last time: these language models are just regurgitating what people have said. They don't analyze or reason.

It's what the ePrivacy directive says, yes. But some get around this by claiming that it's necessary for the operation of the device/service (doubtful) or that it has limited effect on privacy (depends on exceptions created by member states)

National courts to take EU law into account. If you don't agree with their interpretation of EU law, your option is to appeal or ask to refer questions to the EUCJ.