[-] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago

The biggest issue is that there isn't a universal agreement on what causes harm. There is agreement on the basics - murder, violence, etc - but they're already illegal anyways, no need to ban them by license.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

upcoming EU AI Act that regulates open source systems differently, creating an urgent need for practical openness assessment

So when they say "openness" they do put it in the context of open source rather accessibility.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Because FOSS shouldn't add burdens. You publish your work and let everyone else use it. That shouldn't add extra obligations on you. Usually, you'd also write some docs - after all, without them nobody will know how to use your program, so why bother publishing - but it shouldn't be an obligation. Make it easy for people to open up their code without this attaching strings.

Documentation is nice, but it's kind of different thing that open source: a program can be open and undocumented, or closed but well documented - and I don't see why we'd want it different for models.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A bunch of these columns are outright absurd TBH, to the extend I'm not sure the author really knows what FOSS is about. What's open API access even supposed to be - API access is closed by definition.

Also there has never been a requirement that open source software needs to be documented - and for good reason - so I'm not a fan of the documentation column as well.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

However, it also uses halium and libhybris. That means you can't just install your favourite distro and upstream tools. Everything that needs GPU acceleration needs to be patched for libhybris. For example, that means no upstream wlroots - and the latest patched version I think is 0.12 or so.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Actually, no, this seems to work on a very different principle.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Not really. It seems to use a very different technology from termux.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

15 hours for what period of time? The article mentions they'd refill in two days...

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Good point. I'd try to grep for something like [Bb3][Ee3]g[Ii1][nη]\w+<and so on> but I just know I'll miss something

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh, in that case we don't need to read either - just run a simple grep!

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

Finally, presumably if anyone added some malicious code in a their program, it would be sneaky and not obvious from quickly reading the code.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't know why you would expect a pattern-recognition engine to generate pseudo-random seeds, but the reason OpenAI disliked the prompt is that it caused GPT to start repeating itself, and this might cause it to start printing training data verbatim.

view more: next ›

lily33

joined 11 months ago