[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Pros

  • Class-leading, bright 120Hz LTPO OLED panel.
  • Excellent battery life.
  • Very fast charging speed.
  • Snappy and modern chipset, good sustained performance.
  • On-board IR blaster.

Cons

  • Unimpressive selfie and ultrawide cameras.
  • Telephoto camera has only 2x optical zoom.
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

That would be a liability, and they would go after the parent company crying foul play.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah, something like Adguard family DNS protection or any other family protection DNS service exist which works at the device level or even the network level and is simple to setup on smartphones and latops/computers or even the router.

YouTube won't even load comments saying restricted mode if I browse through Adguard family protection DNS server.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

My experience differs. I found optical in display fingerprint to be quite reliable. It even happens to work with slightly wet hands. The room being too dark or bright has also never been an issue since my finger covers the sensor completely.

I guess it depends on the quality of sensor used by the manufacter. Pixel phones are known to have issues.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

That's not how it will work.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Should it arrive to that they can still seize your devices and also force you to unlock your devices biometrics or patterns/passwords regardless. I wouldn't trust law enforcements in this regard.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

Yeah, lol. Who has the time to type a passcode or pattern unlock when a single click or glance can unlock your phone within a second.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Oppo has now announced global variants of both smartphones, but with radically different specifications. For starters, the cameras on the Reno12 Pro is radically different from the vanilla Reno12. Plus, both phones use a MediaTek Dimensity 7300 SoC instead of the Dimensity 8250 (Reno12) and Dimensity 9200+ (Reno12 Pro).

I don't know what it is with global variants getting worse specs compared to Chinese versions. The other two dimensity SOCs would've made these smartphones much better. 7300 is midrange at best.

As mentioned earlier, the Oppo Reno12 Pro and Reno12 come with a MediaTek SoC. Oppo calls it the Dimensity 7300 Energy, which comes with the company's Trinity Engine. It uses the 'power of AI' to dynamically allocate resources to apps.

Hmm...

Lastly, the Oppo Reno12 Pro and Reno12 come with a 5,000 mAh that supports 80 Watt SuperVOOC fast charging with a proprietary charger. USB-PD peripherals can charge the smartphone at up to 55 Watts.

At least USB-PD at high watts is supported.

18
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago

Android is catering to the general public. The average user would easily understand fast, slow and normal. 20w, 68w, 5w not so much. But, I agree not having to use apps or 3rd party cables just to see the charging watts would be great. Even a Dev flag to enable the feature would be cool.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

What ROM? Can't be a pixel

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Its purely a visual change to signal charging speeds to our eyes. There are no changes to power savings yet.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I have a realme smartphone with under display fingerprint sensor. I had last done setup in December for fingerprint and face unlock. It works fine without issues even now. Like the article mentioned it depends on the manufacturer and the hardware tuning. Pixels are known to have frequent issues to warrant this change.

134
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

TL;DR

  • Strings in the latest Android 15 beta suggest the OS can automatically delete biometrics that aren’t working well.
  • Android will delete your face or fingerprint unlock when they aren’t working well and then prompt you to set them up again.
  • We don’t know how the OS determines when a biometric isn’t working well or if this feature is even live yet in the latest Android 15 beta, though.
136
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

TL;DR

  • Android 15 is preparing to tweak the threshold that determines whether a charger is seen as fast, from a measly 7.5W to a more reasonable 20W.
  • The operating system has long considered any charging speeds of at least 7.5W to be fast, which is far, far below what actual fast chargers can deliver nowadays.
  • The change isn’t live yet in the latest Android 15 beta, though, so chargers that deliver 7.5W of power will still be seen as fast on Pixels.
4
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

TL;DR

  • Google is adding an additional layer of security when installing an APK or updating an app through an APK.
  • A PIN or biometric authentication will now be required in certain cases.
  • This will be the case for APKs that Google thinks are malicious or didn’t come from the Play Store.
0
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
91
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

What if charging your phone took less time than brushing your teeth? A new study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences could very well hold the key to a next-gen charger capable of recharging your phone in just 60 seconds.

Researchers from the University of Colorado Boulder have discovered a new cutting-edge technique that could make it possible to charge devices almost instantaneously. This would make charging phones, laptops, and even electric cars much more efficient and convenient. The foundation of the new technique is based on new insights into how ions move through supercapacitors.

The key, one of the researchers explains in a press release, is to make the movement of the ions more efficient. By doing this we can make the charging and release of energy much faster, allowing for that next-gen charger that is capable of boosting your phone’s charge from 0 to 100 in just a minute, or maybe even less.

To make this discovery, the researchers looked at the movement of ions through a complex network of interconnected pores running through the supercapacitor. Their findings have helped modify a scientific law that researchers have used to govern electrical currents for more than 175 years. This law, called the Kirchhoff circuit law, describes the flow of electrons in a simple loop of wiring in most classes.

However, when inspecting the ions and their movement, the researchers found that the ions move fundamentally differently at the intersections of tiny nanoscale pores when compared to how electrons move near the same locations. Further observations helped them determine that these movements are different from what Kirchhoff’s law describes. This doesn’t completely throw out the old laws, though, as they still provide valid explanations for how electronics flow within conventional electronic circuits.

However, to create a next-gen charger capable of taking full advantage of the movements of the ions, we have to look at things different. This, the researchers say, is “the missing link” that they have been looking for. Creating more efficient energy storage has been a long-term goal for many engineers.

We’ve seen water-based batteries capable of storing more than traditional lithium-ion batteries. Still, a method that lets us charge our batteries almost instantly would remove a lot of the hindrances surrounding the wider adoption of things like electric cars. Not to mention how much more convenient a next-gen character would make charging laptops, phones, and other electronic devices.

0
submitted 4 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
0
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
0
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: ‹ prev next ›

limerod

joined 1 year ago