malaph

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Odd to me that you equate productivity with the value of a person.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Like you say avoiding liability is in everyone's interest. In a utopian libertarian society maybe an inspector someone you'd want to pay electively like an engineer.

Someone who could coordinate consultations with surrounding properties and engage others who are experts with say surface water etc.

The other option might be your insurance company would require inspection for you to receive coverage.. In the event of say an HVAC electrical fire. Then the cost is certifying the build is covered by a private company instead of being a state operated service which is free from the pressures of competition. Also then delays in permitting could also incur liability :)

In reality if permitting is quick, affordable and isn't weilded like a political weapon Im mostly fine with it. The federal government is using it to pretty much shut down oil and gas development in Canada. Municipal permitting is partly why we have a massive housing crisis.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah the US is a really poor example of a free market.. I don't think one exists for health care.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Where I live approval on average takes a year or more. Permits alone can cost like 50k for a house. All of those things you've mentioned would result in court cases and awards ..

Honestly even residential houses that are to code are sort of trash aren't they? Like laminated wood chips and saw dust more and more every year.

How many other approvals are required above you to build? How long and at what cost ? Mostly curious. Here its pretty bad IMO. Here being Canada.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I like her stance on economics and free markets .. Also the prime mover concept is somewhat accurate

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Some environmental impact is unavoidable. I think people are maybe a bit more aware and if I knew a company was being unnecessarily wreckless I'd personally not give them a dime. Also this is what lawsuits are for. These companies should be sued into nonexistence.

Why are domestic companies forced to compete on an uneven playing field like that? Why are companies able to just go abroad and import at very favourable rates. That's profoundly unfair .. But have you thought about what would happen to the cost of goods if there was an equal playing field? All the worst things are still done they just happen elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah.. I'm not a fan of that either personally.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Some people are just better in terms of being productive. I don't see how that's debatable. The question is just if you let those people keep they're outsized earnings or you forcibly redistribute them.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

The protagonist being in a privileged position due to government seisuze of private property is certainly an excellent point. I just feel the state exercising power in the other direction, against productive ventures instead of property owners, may be a little too in vogue these days.

view more: next ›