Alright Ive added @[email protected], @[email protected] and @[email protected] as mods and removed the inactive ones.
This, particularly reports are not fully federated.
It was always normalized, but recently there seems to be more backlash from maintainers.
Well written, it would deserve a separate post.
I dont have time to read all that. The problem with Beehaw is that the admins are extremely entitled, as if we had some obligation to work for them for free. Similar to what is described in OP.
However we are consistently improving the mod tools, and accept contributions in that area. You can see in the dev updates.
What is this "stance on mod features" that you are talking about?
Im a former contributor to F-Droid with various merged pull requests. Looking at the indicated pull request I really doubt that it was an intentional attack. First of all its easy to forget for a new developer to escape SQL parameters, and the docs dont even mention a risk of SQL injection attacks. And of the users pushing for the PR to be merged, one is a long-time F-Droid contributor, and the other also looks like a real human with many contributions in other repos, so no sockpuppets in sight.
It simply looks like standard open source behaviour, for better or for worse. A new user makes a contribution for a highly demanded feature, and users want it to get merged as soon as possible. Maintainers are discussing the big picture of the change and want to avoid breaking changes, without getting into code review yet. The new contributor seems unwilling to make any design changes to his PR, and gets frustrated that it doesnt get merged as is. The potential vulnerability is only noticed half a year after the PR was opened, at which point it was already de facto abandoned. So not an attack, but simply a developer who is new to open source and doesnt understand how the process works.
We only do major versions around once a year so those could still be named, while using numbers for minor versions. Lemmy is more user-facing than react, so it would make sense to have a more user-friendly versioning.
The names of previous Lemmy versions were all very boring and repetetive. We need something much more creative. Any ideas?
It's not so bad if companies don't use your project. Normal people won't care.
Say no to proprietary baths! Mine runs arch linux btw
Its okay, everyone is wrong about some things.