propter_hog

No, it's affirmative action. It specifically removes bias.

Testers are a godsend

Based

*comments

I side with you. I've donated over a gallon of blood and blood products throughout the years. You're helping someone. The reason they pay you is to incentivize coming and doing it. It's painful for the donor, and it takes a while for your body to recover. The company doing so is (in my experience, anyway) a non-profit organization. They exist to help people. They do make money, but that's because they have to pay their employees and donors, as you've mentioned.

Get a government job; everybody leaves at 5pm

This is a common misconception, but 9/11 isn't America's birthday, it's world independence day.

They have the new cantina chicken menu, but I haven't tried it yet. Looks good, though.

~~Khan Academy~~

Edit: nm, didn't see you already use it

Oh I definitely agree with you there. I just think GPL is close but not close enough.

That's why the current state of open source licenses doesn't work. Commercial use should be forbidden for free users. You could dual license the work, with a single, main license applying to everyone, and a second addendum license that just contains the clause for that specific use, be it personal or corporate. Corporate use of any kind requires supporting the project financially.

Cracker