rottingleaf

joined 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, it's almost fun thinking of how they'd react to my porn selection.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm actually sympathetic to anyone having an ideology not to help their identity, but trying to imagine a structure that works.

Ancaps are expected to be good in that regard, tankies are expected to be bad in that regard, but in general there are good and bad people in any group. I've met almost (the premise of racial difference in quality is still wrong obviously) reasonable Nazis, and not alt-rights at that, but real honest Nazis.

I've been excited about Trotskyism at some point, because while there are problems with their proposed ideal state (which is similar to what's described in Norbert Wiener's "Cybernetics"), they have a proposed mechanism and it's been even tested in Rojava (their bigger issue is with armed apes around them though, and also with the USA abandoning them after not needing them against ISIS).

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago

It's a pleasing thought, of course, that an influential person may have morals and good goals (and nice looks).

But since there's no way to know for sure, I think I'll just stop trying to classify those names into good and evil.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe the US government (or even "deep state" or something) has realized that making everyone use insecure devices for easier surveillance is as smart as forbidding fire exits so that people would be easier to arrest.

I haven't heard too many bad things about Signal.

Various dictatorships want to simply read correspondence because the social graphs producing actual value and keeping stability in our world, and also protecting their embezzled value stored abroad, are all abroad too, and they won't hurt these. Some politicians in the west want to invade privacy for the same reason - what they embezzle is stored in ways unaffected by insecure communications in their own countries.

But if you are part of some establishment, even if not well-meaning, you are interested to protect the system from outright erosion, meaning secure communications.

Other than that, WhatsApp and FB Messenger are owned by Zuck and he's become too big to tolerate, Telegram is an African brothel with no protection and plenty of diseases, and in general it's all corporate around.

Let's please also remember that there are people of various views and interests in every organization and force.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

A lot of software nowadays is doing a real disservice to their users by continuing to lie to them like this by selling them the notion that they can control their information after it has been sent. It’s really making people forget basic information hygiene. No app can guarantee that message won’t be intercepted or mishandled. They can only give you tools to hopefully prevent that, but there are no guarantees.

Oh, yes. These "deleted messages", or these "hidden likes", or whatever else.

I mean, there are fundamental things and algorithms allowing to create such a system, with blinded keys, ghost keys and what not, only these disgusting cheats have a centralized service where any employee can see everything, yet pretend that they have "a security feature".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's actually sad, even though I'm a libertarian, tankies and in general marxists could have made a good input into our future. But if they can believe in Telegram being secure because of vibes and not even doing basic research, they've already lost.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago

It's easier, but Telegram's authors are from Russia. They psychologically can't accept that "never have the keys" thing. They want to have control and they want to be able to tell "yes" to the investigator, possibly for something in return.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

And it's sad that it doesn't. Because that's why people use Telegram.

Media hosting - we-ell, I suppose something similar to bittorrent (or just sharing encrypted files over bittorrent) would do to back such a system?

Telegram's channels are like blogs, they have reactions and comment links leading to a groupchat associated with a channel.

It's basically a social network in an instant messenger format.

Telegram is socially , in terms of finding a market niche, the smartest thing of what's happened in the Internet recently. Durov really is a good businessman.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah, try telling your family, friends, colleagues, therapist to use Signal.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago

Telegram is a propaganda weapon in some sense, between two worldviews - one is "a good service doesn't require trust, because they physically can't sell you", another is "a good service you can trust because they won't sell you". And Telegram helps the latter.

So frankly - kill it with fire. Sadly I'm in Russia and everybody uses it here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

It is inflation. And "greed" is accounted for in the definition of a market. Oligopolies are not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Also take showers when you feel like it, not when it's appropriate. Well, at least put some water on your face and make your feet wet, if shower is not an option.

(At least that helps me personally.)

The "less sugar" advice is good.

The physical exhaustion advice is good.

But frankly all this seems connected to that cluster of autism\depression\ADHD or something. Getting more dopamine, reducing prolactin, reducing bodily disregulation, something like that.

view more: ‹ prev next ›