Is the abstract concept of “competition” more important than weaning out of fossil fuels in order to keep Earth habitable for humans?

You need to understand, this is written by economists, the people who make a living by justifying human suffering.

Even if it's a nice solution the licensing issue, they are still deceiving their users. I don't think I have seen anything like them but they should be clear that they are bluetooth.

Curious. I always imagined it was a reference to the folklore create 'Imp'.

some contributor agreement does force people to surrender their copyright. MongoDB is probably the most infamous example.

I had the same though. No way they would choose that wording otherwise. they will probably just make it available, also make people who contribute sign their copyright away.

Same goes for words in foreign languages. it just causes confusion. I like how eclipse went for “temurin” (anagram for runtime) for their OpenJDK distribution. no way to cause confusion.

this guy is 100% committed to give nazis a platform, right?

terrariums and motorcycles. the worst

“radiation” levels are barely outside of regulation. and france has record of testing devices more strictly than the rest of countries. my guess is Apple will appeal, it will be retested and all will be good. the same has happened before (I think 7,8 and 11, but don’t quote me on it)

yes, but they also tend to have crappy specs compared to 'good' TVs.

Im not sold in the idea. I did find a couple of OLED 4k 120hz monitors on 'TV size' (BenQ MOBIUZ EX480UZ ), but then they dont seem to have (or at least advertise) hdmi-arc or hdmi-CEC support, and the brightness is only 480 nits (vs 800 of a LG C2) and it seems more expensive.

I would not recommend it as a replacement for an actual TV in a living room.

I don’t think there are many monitors that support 24fps natively.