If anyone saw a guy named AnonymouseJoker posting on any thread about GrapheneOS and criticize it, please ignore. What he is doing is spreading misinformation about an operating system that take a true approach to security. So CIA agents aka "journalists" will not find out a secure operating system to use, and then their phone can explode whenever the Chinese government want.

What I do here is analyzing the content of TheAnonymouseJoker's posts. When I saw he say 98% Chinese people approve their government, it popped up in my brain today that TheAnonymouseJoker is separating disgusting "journalists" from a secure operating system. Then those "journalists" will get their device hacked by the Chinese government when they came to China. Is that right?

I might be in their room next month. But what they gain from kidnapping a 15 years old child from Viet Nam? I'm not Zhuge Liang. Reading Sun Tsu's book and find out the reason why a joker jokes is not something special.

Just words of extreme nationalists.

Encrypted forms are not usable. Uncaught Error: TIMEOUT. I enabled WASM.

What have you used that’s worked well? Or, could I run Rufus on my linux machine with WINE?

A BLOODY STUPID IDEA!

Using Wine is just stupid enough.

dd is safe. I have used Balena's Etcher 2 years ago but it seems the drive isn't bootable in UEFI mode!

Also mean more commercial distros. Less donations to BSDs projects.

And it also increase the strength of Apple and Google, do you want to see that?

It requires any modifications to be under GPL.

And it also requires anything that incorporate GPL codes also be under GPL.

And the code must be published to the copyright holder as far as I know.

How it harms the end user are described.

(A)GPL restrict the modification of the software. I'm sharing an example how that restriction works.

Thank you.

Congratulations for not being in any team!

I've written more clearly that you must be a writer to join team 1 or 2. Keep going on your project, and ignore those who are fanatical and like to meddle in other people's affairs, like the guys who want a project to refuse donations and contributions from some specific or all company.

Thanks.

Open source software has its source code published. It doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re able to copy some or all of it, modify it, distribute it, etc.

GPL as an example.

Free software can be freely copied, modified, distributed, etc

If you are citing the GNU's website, you should remove the "modified". I'd quote a mailing list user:

Say if OpenSSH was licenced under (A)GPL, companies would likely not use it because they wouldn't be able to incorporate it into their IP, they would then try to code a shoddy implementation, and have numerous security bugs which would affect the end user. In other words, you are just shooting yourself in the foot.