sub_ubi

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Where do you see the propaganda coming from? What entity do you imagine is funding this propaganda?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Are you a bot? You're firing off AM radio talking points at a pretty rapid clip.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You have one question in your previous comment on the very first line, and it was answered.

Your statement on the 2nd line doesn't really make sense, as I don't think anyone blames people for unforseen negative health effects.

What people are upset about are the forseen, proven, endemic negative health effects being purposefully spread for over a century.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

wow you sound like an expert in logical fallacies, you must have studied them really hard.

Can you put the fallacious statement you identified in this thread into a logical statement, and then explain how it's fallacious? Feel free to use formal symbols!

It would really help me understand the fallacy, and it must be easy for you to do as an expert.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

It's funny liberals had to start calling it "Whataboutism" as the previous term made it clear they were racist.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

It doesn't sound like you understand these terms.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Great point, and regulation is still being fought by the real estate industry.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Explain the logical flaw in this thread's exchange. Bonus: If you're going with tu quoque, explain it without putting words into anyone's mouth.

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2022/03/is-whataboutism-always-a-bad-thing

[–] [email protected] 57 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Did chatgpt not include this or...?

https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.gatech.edu/dist/a/1473/files/2020/09/sovenv.pdf

Nevertheless, the Soviet Union took effective action to protect the population from lead exposure; it banned lead-based (white lead) paint and it banned the sale of leaded gasoline in some cities and regions. While leaded gasoline was introduced in the 1920s in the United States, it was not until the 1940s that leaded gasoline was introduced in the Soviet Union (5). In the 1950s, the Soviet Un- ion became the first country to restrict the sale of leaded gaso- line; in 1956, its sale was banned in Moscow, Leningrad, Kiev, Baku, Odessa, and tourist areas in the Caucasus and Crimea, as well as in at least one of the “closed cities” of the nuclear weap- ons complex (6, 7). The motivation for the bans on leaded gaso- line is not entirely clear, but factors may have included Soviet research on the effects of low-level lead exposure (8), or sup- port from Stalin himself (5). In any event, the bans on leaded gasoline in some areas prevented what could have been signifi- cant population lead exposure. In the United States and other OECD countries, leaded gasoline has been identified as one of the largest sources of lead exposure (9, 10). Lead-based paint is another potentially significant source of population lead exposure.

Bonus: a great example of capital at work,

Along with a number of other coun- tries, in the 1920s the Soviet Union adopted the White Lead Convention, banning the manufacture and sale of lead-based (white lead) paint (11). In the United States, however, the National Paint, Oil and Varnish Association successfully opposed the ban, and lead-based paint was not banned in the United States until 1971 (12).

Two generations of Americans.

view more: ‹ prev next ›