xkforce

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

If you are expected to be productive, that is by definition, not "free time."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If only it were so easy to break bad habits.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago

Stimulants work because what theyre actually stimulating is your prefrontal cortex and the executive function associated with it. The teacher needs coffee analogy in another comment is reasonably spot on.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Tbh I think that bugs everyone not just us lol

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Yes which is why I was switched over to the Strattera generic which isnt a stimulant. It helps but honestly therapy and exercise did most of the work.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

The extensions revamp that they did killed most of the really cool extensions. At that point, there was really no point in staying with Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

That's not how any of this works. You see in science you have to actually do the work needed to support your hypothesis. And that hypothesis needs to be based on you understanding all the material that went into that hypothesis. Penrose hasn't done any of that. He doesn't have the expertise needed to form a good model for consciousness and he hasn't done the work to support that model.

In science, ideas that aren't supported by evidence are thrown in the trash not treated as worthy of further discussion. That's why we don't give astrology or young earth creationism the time of day. Because there is nothing to support them and a mountain of evidence against them. Just like there is nothing to support Penrose's ideas about consciousness.

Science is not a safe space. You have to actually defend your ideas against scrutiny.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

My perspective is that someones' opinion isnt worth anything unless they actually have relevant expertise in what they are talking about. I do not need a degree in neuroscience to point that out.

Some opinions are worth more than others. Opinions based on facts and relevant expertise matter more than ones that arent. Penrose DOES NOT have the expertise needed to be taken seriously when it comes to consciousness.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Biochemists arent claiming that they know AI better than AI researchers do. If you dont understand why it is dangerous to be talking about things outside of your wheelhouse then there is no arguing with you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Penrose is a physicist. Thats where his expertise lies. He is not a neuroscientist, psychologist or any other profession that is relevant. He is NOT an expert in the area he has barged into. Being competent in one field DOES NOT translate into competence in others.

You may as well ask a very good plumber about how they think the brain works.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

Nonsense is still nonsense. Penrose like many physicists, is speculating outside of his core expertise to his own detriment.

 

Every time its a 5 minute borderline painless task that my brain has built up to be the equivalent of deciding which finger Id prefer to lose.

view more: next ›