this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
173 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37360 readers
357 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (8 children)

It's interesting times. The difference between traditional management and progressive leadership will determine which companies get to exist.

A manager waiting for data to show what path to take will always be behind the leaders when times are changing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (7 children)

They might be a little bit behind the successful innovators, but I think anyone actually observing the data and shaping their policy accordingly will be fine.

We all knew productivity in at least US companies was up as a consequence of home office. It was all over the news. It's just that management either don't understand the data or are unwilling to shape their policies by it.

In general, people make decisions based on their convictions, not based on evidence.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That’s a great example - makes me wonder who actually liked it in the first place to sell it - my boss, his boss and basically everyone I knew hated open space. Where did this scourge originate?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

It's just much cheaper, and often you don't even need one seat per worker. So the gamble is that "sure, people hate it, but we save so much money by making the office shittier that we can afford a slight dump in productivity per worker".

It's not that they actually think it's good - that's just something they pretend so that they don't have to tell the truth. The truth is that they made a calculation and concluded that having happy employees just wasn't worth it.

I think companies tend to underestimate the value of happy employees.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

At the time, open office space was supposed to create a better environment for collaboration and as alternative to the dreaded cubicles.

This was also in time where people would send physical paperwork to each other through an internal mail system from one cubicle to another. Like there'd be an assistant to carry paper around.

It also made the office sizes more flexible.

It might work for people who desperately need to bounce their creative ideas off each other, but for anyone else it just plain sucks.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)