this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
617 points (80.6% liked)

Memes

44094 readers
2930 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Horseshoe theory is bullshit. One side has extremists who burn down cars the other has extremists who burn people. It is not the same.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

The third side has people who burn themselves.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

🤔 Isn't there a logical fallacy that addresses erroneously comparing two things in such a manner? If not, we badly need to make a new one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you thinking of equivocation? The very first one here: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fallacies/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No no, not that one. I think it's like a genetic fallacy but I am not sure. It's like when dumbasses say fighting evil is the same as being evil.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm quite sure it is, because equivocation often occurs by boiling down two disparate concepts to the same vague and simple description, in this case "using violence against those you disagree with". Genetic fallacy is guilt by association.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It is called a false equivalence but you can argue that the extreme left/right are much more inclined to violence without making a false equivalence.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ehh. There are centrists and people from other factions who support violence too, snd extremists who do not. There's a lot of nuance in the situation

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd argue if they are arguing for violence they aren't centrists.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Really? The guy who thinks both sides are the same and wants them to kill each other so they'll all shut the fuck up isn't a centrist?

Nonviolence is not a requirement to be a centrist. Believing both the American left and right are the same or very similar, and/or believing in horseshoe theory is all that's required.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You are adding the bit that they want them to kill each other. That's not a centrist attitude. The centrist would be asking everyone to try to work together rather than forcing others to toe our specific line.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

That's simply not how centrism works. Centrism is not and has never been about nonviolence. It has been about viewing the two major factions in the U.S. as the same or similar, and honestly trying to view or portray oneself as superior to both. Nonviolence can be used for such purposes but is not required.

I used to be a centrist and know many more than you. I've dealt with this crap for decades. I know more about it than you do. I've rolled with both factions, and there are many centrists who feel the way they do without the nonviolence. Just because you are a centrist and nonviolent doesn't mean all centrists have to be nonviolent to be a centrist... but that self - centered way of thinking on your part shows centrism is largely about feeling superior to others.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So the issue is you have no idea what centrism means.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

The issue is you think centrism means being like you when it is anything but.