this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
620 points (80.5% liked)

Memes

45130 readers
1451 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The DPRK is socialist and not a hereditary autocracy. It has been the consistent direction of the head of the executive branch to diffuse authority to other offices, but nearly everything you have ever heard about this country was a lie.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It literally has handed power down from father to son twice. That is a hereditary system. As the citizens cannot advocate for a change in leaders, a change in direction of the party or an entirely new political system they are authoritarian.

DPRK is a hereditary autocracy.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It literally has handed power down from father to son twice.

It has had sons win elections and then hold the office twice. We can call it dynastic in a sense similar to US political dynasties, but that's different from being literally hereditary.

As the citizens cannot advocate for a change in leaders, a change in direction of the party or an entirely new political system

Citation needed

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting they had a free and fair election? Let's not be that stupid.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their elections have been observed many times by different external bodies and are an example of consensus democracy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have a source for that claim because I have only seen the opposite from elections experts. The fact that almost every single person votes is of course a MASSIVE red flag.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I believe participation is mandatory, like in Australia, and given the travel limitations (the part of a percent that doesn't vote are usually people traveling), it makes sense that it would be so high. Of course, since we have a wonderful freedom of speech in this country where the rich are free to buy media companies and promote the stories they want to promote, the idea of actually investigating the elections for a purpose other than vilification is hardly going to creep into search engine results. Here's a compilation of sources that attempt to explore it from that angle:

https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/master/socialism_faq.md#is-the-dprk-a-fascist-monarchy

Archive of a dead link: https://archive.ph/aMJCI