this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
395 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37343 readers
502 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta conducted an experiment where thousands of users were shown chronological feeds on Facebook and Instagram for three months. Users of the chronological feeds engaged less with the platforms and were more likely to use competitors like YouTube and TikTok. This suggests that users prefer algorithmically ranked feeds that show them more relevant content, even though some argue chronological feeds provide more transparency. While the experiment found that chronological feeds exposed users to more political and untrustworthy content, it did not significantly impact their political views or behaviors. The researchers note that a permanent switch to chronological feeds could produce different results, but this study provides only a glimpse into the issue.


I think this is bullshit. I exclusively scroll Lemmy in new mode. I scroll I see a post I already have seen. Then I leave. That doesn't mean I hate it, I'm just done!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 258 points 11 months ago (3 children)

They don't "hate" chronological feeds. The study say they are more likely to disengage, and that's probably because people got what they need from the chronological feed and log off to do other things....

Proving that chronological feed is more healthy.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 11 months ago

This sounds like a successful efficiency study presented by a horror director.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago

Yeah, if you were ever unsure where wired stands as a reputable organization, here's all the evidence you need.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Why would you "get what you need" quicker with a chronological feed? The more engaged with content is what most people are going to the site for, it's like browsing Lemmy on top vs new, and frankly new is mostly crap.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

I’m much more “engaged” when you hide my needle in a haystack. Simply handing me the needle allows me to grab it and go.

Needle in this case is finding out what my friends are up to

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

When I look at my subscriptions, I sort by new because it lets me see what I want quicker. Top is filled with old things so I almost never use it. Hot is what I use if not restricting to just subs. Once I'm done looking at what's new, I'm done. No wasting time on stuff I've seen before.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

What I want is to see the new posts of my network. With chronological, I know when I see a previously seen post, that I'm done. With algorithmic, I'm scrolling past tons of posts I've seen before, hoping to find a new one every once in a while. And I never know when I'm done, so I frustratingly close the app after a longer time.