this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
480 points (94.3% liked)

Asklemmy

42502 readers
2074 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What I would like to know is if we will ever have microwaves that stop the spinning plate in the same place that they started. It's XXI century, I want to take out my cup as easily as I've put it in.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

~~Most~~ Many microwave plate motors are 6 rpm. If you always stick to 10 seconds increments, it should end right where it started.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Most microwaves I use (at home and work) have 30sec increment buttons so I always stick to 10 second increments and no, they don't end when they started.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Still issue? Idk ๐Ÿ˜‚

Edit: I do see some that use 3rpm so those would always be backwards at 30 seconds. 50hz supply would also change the rotation speed. My turntable is very predictable at least, so i guess I'll take the personal win and go.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It could easily be done, but would only work if: you don't stop the cycle manually by opening the door, or you are ok with the microwave quickly spinning your food (or liquid filled cup) to the starting position as soon as you do open the door.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

No, what it should do is:

  • when timer ends or stop button is pressed it should turn off microwaves but keep spinning until original position
  • when door is opened just stop everything immediately

This way you can stop the plate manually at any position but when operating microwave in the usual way you get the benefit of the cup always pointing the right way.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

when timer ends or stop button is pressed it should turn off microwaves but keep spinning until original position

Better yet, change the rotation speed to match the timer.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It would require variable speed motors and more complex chip and programming so it would be more expensive. Just spinning the plate at the same speed until it makes a full turn could be solved mechanically.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I mean, sure, but there are microwaves out there that measure the heat of food put in it to cook it automatically. I figure a variable speed to match an input time would be just a bit easier to accomplish than that.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Have it calculate the amount of full rotations and round it down to the nearest whole number. Worst case scenario, your cup is static for 5โ€“10 seconds before the microwave stops.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

That can be done, just takes a more expensive Platten motor, and some more code in the control unit.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

It's a pretty specific patent that says you delay the cooking by couple of seconds while spinning the plate to 'synchronize' the start and stop positions. There are more ways to do it so it would be fairly easy to avoid this patent. I don't know why it's not a standard feature.