Memes

44226 readers

1908 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Senior to Boss? (lemm.ee)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Your raise schedule should be outlined in your union contract! :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

But if I join a union, then I might have to pay union dues!!! Getting a 20% raise isn't worth losing 2% to dues!!!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

On a similar note, paying 10% of my total income to health insurance is absolutely worth it, because they partially pay for 3 doctors visits per year and tell me to go fuck myself when I need antidepressants or Advil.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

The typical high deductible health plans these days only seem to work well for people that need like no healthcare, or people who need a ton of it.

My secret trick is to have an incurable condition where the medications to hopefully stabilize you or slow progress of the disease are so hilariously expensive that the pharma company will pay all of my out of pocket costs. It’s like my employer pays me my salary, then my insurance company pays an entire separate yearly salary to the pharma company.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You need to phrase that differently.

It's not 20% raise, it's 1/5 more. And it's not 2% dues, it's 1/50 less.

See the dues are definitely worse!!!!!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The sad thing is, there are people who wholeheartedly agree with that reasoning…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

One of the most vivid arithmetic failings displayed by Americans occurred in the early 1980s, when the A&W restaurant chain released a new hamburger to rival the McDonald’s Quarter Pounder. With a third-pound of beef, the A&W burger had more meat than the Quarter Pounder; in taste tests, customers preferred A&W’s burger. And it was less expensive. A lavish A&W television and radio marketing campaign cited these benefits. Yet instead of leaping at the great value, customers snubbed it.

Only when the company held customer focus groups did it become clear why. The Third Pounder presented the American public with a test in fractions. And we failed. Misunderstanding the value of one-third, customers believed they were being overcharged. Why, they asked the researchers, should they pay the same amount for a third of a pound of meat as they did for a quarter-pound of meat at McDonald’s. The “4” in “¼,” larger than the “3” in “⅓,” led them astray.

Did Third-of-a-Pound Burger Fail Because People Didn't Understand Fractions? by Snopes, June 17, 2022

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Have you considered how many video games you can buy using all that money you saved on union dues?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

We talking full priced or steam summer sale?