this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
543 points (79.4% liked)

Memes

45192 readers
1380 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The more animal flesh you consume, the younger you die and the more major diseases you suffer. Google: "all cause mortality meat".

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I eat so much meat that my life expectancy went negative and rolled over to the maximum allowed value of 2,147,483,647 years.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The more animal flesh you consume, the younger you die and the more major diseases you suffer

you have no idea what their nutritional needs or risk factors are

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You've been shouting at the sky this whole thread.

You do know vegans only want people to be vegan who can do so in a healthy way, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

this is a smoke screen. that user made a specific claim and I pointed out that they are making it up

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I pointed out that they are making it up

Is that what you think you are doing??

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

this is just posturing

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well now, that's not entirely true. If you will grant me, at least for the sake of this discussion, that /u/dullbananas is a homo sapiens, then I know, to a scientific certainty, that the more meat this homo sapiens consumes, the younger they will die, and the more major health consequences they will suffer.

Would you like to see the several significant and influential studies, some of which span several decades, that establishes this as an indisputable fact or would you just like to keep coming up with the same pat objections that everyone who wishes it was okay to keep eating meat tries to use to rationalize the decision?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know, to a scientific certainty, that the more meat this homo sapiens consumes, the younger they will die, and the more major health consequences they will suffer.

no, you don't

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think you meant to say, "no, you don't, and I won't look at any evidence to the contrary, la la la, i cannot hear you, la la la"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

this is a straw man. it's also not evidence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I asked you if you wanted evidence and you just said stupid shit at me. Would you LIKE evidence, now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it's impossible to have evidence about the future.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Then why are you so afraid to say, "Yes, please show me your evidence. I will read it and consider your point?" You would rather attack my evidence without ever knowing what it is, because you are not engaging in good faith.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've presented exactly as much evidence as you have.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you want a nice introduction to why a proper plant based diet is in most cases better for longevity listen to this interview. The 2½ hours are really rewarding and you'll get some very important (live-prolonging) information:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5B0rlNvhog

This 7 min excerpt from the interview briefly touches why changing our diets is imperative for the survivability of future generations:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8rtyomVu88

The podcast of Simon Hill is called "The Proof".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

the first video says flat out that there is no conclusive science about a single diet that is best (it's around the 15 minute mark), and the second seems to support what i've been saying in this thread: individuals choosing to buy one thing or another is irrelevant. what matters is the systemic impacts and systemic change.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

not afraid of anything. I have no interest in providing any semblance of validity to your specious argument