507
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Americans who get their news primarily from cable are the only people who believe that Israel is not committing a genocide in Gaza, according to a new survey that examined the relationship between attitudes toward the war and news consumption habits.

The survey puts numbers on trends that have become increasingly apparent: Cable news viewers are more supportive of Israel’s war effort, less likely to think Israel is committing war crimes, and less interested in the war in general. People who get their news primarily from social media, YouTube, or podcasts, by contrast, generally side with the Palestinians, believe Israel is committing war crimes and genocide, and consider the issue of significant importance.

Archive link

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 94 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago

Presumably a big chunk of the cable news demographic are watching Fox, which notoriously has been proven to leave its viewers knowing less than people who don't watch news at all.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago

I don't think you understand just how aligned all of the networks are on this issue.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Fox's rhetoric is just the most obvious / laughable (assuming you have a brain)

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah, you're right. I shouldn't have assumed you were giving cover to the other networks. Sorry if I sounded hostile! Seems like we're on the same page.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I only get to see it via clips on Seth Meyers but it reminds me of Idiocracy.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

Yeah regular viewers of CNN, which runs every story about Palestine by the IDF first, are totally on the side of genocide is happening...

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Just to be clear I'm not trying to disagree with OP's article.

Let alone set up some kind of binary where CNN is somehow exempt. I was just making an observation about this demographic.

I'm not American so I don't see these channels but their online coverage is biased AF.

In some of the threads about Tiktok I've been saying that I think the generational divide is more between boomers who watch TV news cycles versus people who get more varied sources of info online. Had to watch our free-to-air TV a couple of weeks ago and the news on the Gaza Genocide was ridiculously pro IDF.

Tagging @macabrett who made a similar point to me.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

This isn't as much of a left / right issue as other things. Coverage of cable news across the entire political spectrum is running cover for the genocide.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

democrat/republican issue...ftfy. Pretty sure the left is clear about what's happening here

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Democrats and republicans are both right wing; cable news really only ranges from far right to centrist.

There aren't any leftists siding with genocide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago

And yet there are still lots of people on here who tell us that western media is not biased, and trot out nonsense like mediabiasfactcheck to argue why we should only consume information from mainstream western sources.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

I talked to a boomer fox news watcher recently, and apparently the current party line is that since the US firebombed dresden, what Israel is doing to Gaza is justified. The US even bombed white europeans, so how can you criticize them for killing middle-easterners?

IE, nothing wrong with murdering civilians as long as the US did it first, and to criticize Israel for doing what the US already did is unpatriotic, and the protesters have no right to protest this genocide.

At least the US right is honest about their values, and make no justifications or apologies for civilian murder.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Indeed, this is the key difference I see between liberals and conservatives in US. Conservatives are just more honest about their support for US hegemony by any means necessary. Meanwhile, liberals will do hand wringing and talk about lesser evils to justify atrocities.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Meh, Reuters, which is pretty much the mainstream western source, has been relatively good on calling out Israel, and even funded an independent investigation that found that the IDF probably purposefully shelled one of their journalists.

Doesn't mean that having a wider variety of sources isn't still good, of course.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

It's becoming very difficult to hide what's happening in Israel, so it is starting to leak into western mainstream media now. However, it's pretty clear that there has been a strong bias from the start. And the question you should ask yourself is what other biases western media promotes in a similar fashion.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago

TV will be known as the lead in the pipes that drove Rome mad.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Specifically the 24 hour News Cycle.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Also the lead in the pipes and (previously) gasoline.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

capitaldcolon

Its sad how effective tv propaganda is. I'm glad social media, despite all its flaws exists now.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

Only social media users said they’d be more likely to support a candidate who supported Palestinians (33-19 percent). Just 15 percent of cable news viewers said the same, even though 31 percent of cable viewers agreed that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians.

Does this mean what I think it means? That roughly half of the cable news watchers who believe that Israel is commiting genocide literally do not care?

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

No necessarily half but that's the logical result. theoretically there could be some weird group that doesn't believe in genocide (part of the 69%) but would still support a pro Palestine candidate. Furthermore, as bad as the destruction of Palestine is many people only consider genocide to literally be the Holocaust and that style of commiting it. I could conceive of some pedants saying there isn't a genocide but to stop the violence.

Though, I unfortunately think you might be right.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

In your scenario, if some of the people who think there is no genocide still supported a pro Palestinians candidate (likely that there are at least some), then the number of people who believe there is a genocide, but still wouldn't support a pro Palestinians candidate would be even higher. My scenario is actually the most optimistic one.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Uhh, worse actually. I think it means about 50% of Cable news watchers (Fox, OAN) who feel it's a genocide, think getting rid of Palestinians is a good thing and that they had it coming.

They're the creepy Americans, sorry...we hate them too.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

I used to think there wasn’t a conspiracy until I visited the states and heard a neoliberal loudly ranting to themselves about how they’re “not able control people through the media anymore because everyone’s on the internet” There it was, straight out of the horse’s asshole.

https://lemmy.ml/comment/10540478

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Hence the TikTok ban

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Jesus Christ, what is CNN airing? That's pretty much the only story in Israel/Palestine. Legitimate argument is just about whether it's genocide, or "only" close.

Edit: Unfortunately I can't see the study for the exact percentage of cable news viewers. Fox, of course, is unsurprising. Fluff pieces go where important ones that are too politically inconvenient would. CNN usually likes to follow the bleeding wherever it goes.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

That thumbnail hits different all of a sudden.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

That’s what the revolution will not be televised has always meant though

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, verified news sources courting genocides.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Cable news viewers and Redditors.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Very interesting, if not surprising.

I wonder if this would remain true if you controlled for other highly correlated factors like age and political affiliation. Do young leftists who watch cable news (admittedly likely a very small population) still support Israel's genocide? What about old conservatives who use TikTok?

While on the subject though, why the emphasis on cable news? The article made no mention of traditional free-to-air TV.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

I think the key term is "primarily". The only young leftists who get their news primarily from cable are basically in a household hostage situation.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Do young leftists who watch cable news (admittedly likely a very small population) still support Israel’s genocide? What about old conservatives who use TikTok?

I mean the sum of those two cohorts make up such a vanishingly small percentage of anyone its a rounding error. Its likely what you originally assumed, that the breakdown is going along pyschodemographic lines. Old ill informed people watch TV news, and the local stations have offloaded all that unsightly political stuff that ruffles advertiser feathers to cable news. And then your only getting the illusion of variety. Its always the same procorporate, neoliberal, neoconserivative uniparty.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The article made no mention of traditional free-to-air TV.

Free = socialist

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

That seems somewhat surprising, considering how much internet media post bias also exists.

I guess cable users only stick to one or two news channels?

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's not surprising to me. There is no more "news" anymore, it's all opinions at this point. Usually not good opinions either, it's all just a carefully crafted narrative or crafted to generate outrage.

This is why I think things like Tiktok are actually useful. I don't know another place to easily find 24/7 live video of the protests.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Cable news seems to be allergic to providing any kind of context no matter what the issue is, despite having 24 hours to fill. They'll typically just loop the same 10 second clip from the event and then have 2 pundits who don't actually know anything talk about it.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Well, if you open up Tiktok, Instagram, Twitter and co. you can see the destruction, you can see Palestinians searching through the rubble to find survivors and recover the dead. You can see children starving and you can see crying people holding the bodies of their loved ones. And then you can also see IDF soldiers bragging about the people they killed, filming themselves looting, burning down houses and desecrating peoples belongings. You can see them filming themselves torturing and abusing prisoners and laughing about it all.

When you are exposed to the stream of more or less raw information, it doesn't take much to understand the situation as what it is. Yes there is bias in there. But when the supposedly "good guys" from the IDF are showing themselves proudly committing atrocities, then the only people to not consider it a genocide are completely brainwashed. And unfortunately that audience exists too, cheering on the atrocities committed in their name.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It does say primary source of news is from cable, that doesn't mean they don't use these other platforms.

And you have to believe these people's social media is an echo chamber of their cable news

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Imagine having the free time and money to just watch cable.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Cable's target audience is affluent old folks so it makes sense.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

you're going to get that when

a) western media and journalists are deathly afraid of being labeled antisemites for reporting on what the secular government of israel is doing and

b) cable news viewers skew overwhelmingly republican and conservative who are already antimuslim and pro israel to begin with.

these are the people who are keeping the current administration from telling it like it really is. because I honestly don't believe that bibi would be as empowered to do what he's been doing in gaza if the us government isn't actively publicly condemning in plain language what has happened already.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What a shock. And by shock I also mean indictment of ~~the~~ traditional cable media.

Edit: Fined tuned some blame.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://m.piped.video/watch?v=QnJFhuOWgXg

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Makes sense, tbh.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
507 points (95.5% liked)

World News

31423 readers
1195 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS