315

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

In the context of US constitutional law, yes. But freedom of speech can have a wider meaning in moral philosophy. What someone might mean when they speak of the idea will vary.

Anyway, I don’t think anyone has an obligation to listen to or host content they find offensive or harmful, but in the context of a public forum that hosts a wide range of non-curated content and discourse, removing content or banning people just because it is critical of you or you disagree with it may be morally wrong. Especially when there are clearly outlined rules and the content does not clearly violate those rules. This happens frequently on this instance (and others, but this seems to be the main offender among the big instances currently).

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

That'll always come down to the moderation team and their views of content, and it'll always be a thing in online forums. I can still remember the, ahem, other place, and their mods on a power trip were legendary for stifling conversation points they disagreed with. Same thing happened on Digg before that.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago

They know this because they people crying about the first amendment and "cancel culture" are consistently the ones doing it to others.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Wait, it's all projection?

🌏 👨‍🚀 🔫 👩‍🚀

Always has been.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Freedom of Speech != Obligation to Listen

[-] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

You’re free to be an ass and I’m free to call you one.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

I've been shown so many doors, you'd think I wouldn't need to be shown anymore, but here we are.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

It is worth remembering: any law reflects the moral right to free expression. There are limits - there are always limits - but you are correct to have some expectations of leeway, anywhere you go.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

right-wing libertarian philosophy

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024

315 points (96.2% liked)

Comics

5515 readers

474 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine 🇵🇸 . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

If possible, give us your sources.
If possible, credit creators of each comics in the title or body of your post. If you are the creator, please credit yourself. A simple “- Me” would suffice.
In general terms, write in body of your post as much information as possible (dates, creators, editors, links).
If you found the image on the web, it is encouraged to put the direct link to the image in the ‘Link’ field when creating a post, instead of uploading the image to Lemmy. Direct links usually end in .jpg, .png, etc.
One post by topic.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]