this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
62 points (91.9% liked)

Asklemmy

42502 readers
1454 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

More and more people are against giving kids internet access. Allow me to go against the grain:

If your child is neurodivergent, or LGBTQ+, or any other form of misfit, then denying them internet access is tantamount to condemning them to social isolation. It wasn't until I got unrestricted internet access, circa 17 years of age, that I realised that actually, no, I wasn't a fucking alien, there were hundreds of thousands of people just like me, but I didn't know because I was stuck in this shitty small town with shitty small town people. So I spent seventeen years thinking there was something fundamentally wrong with me when in reality there was something wrong with the environment around me.

I would have had a much happier early life if I'd gotten internet earlier. Wouldn't have spent 90% of my teens being suicidal.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 13 hours ago

Places of religious worship and formal teaching (e.g. churches, and Sunday schools) should be treated like bars and porn. You need to be an adult to access bars and porn because children do not fully understand what is happening or the consequences of being there. Churches (etc) are the same and there should be a legal age limit.

It should also be socially unacceptable to talk about religious opinions in front of kids, just like most people don't swear or talk dirty, etc.

I agree with schools teaching kids "about" religions, just like sex and drugs. Teaching facts is good, preaching (aka indoctrination) is not.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know if this is a hot take, but I think people need to stop basing their lives off of celebrities/influencers. We equate wealth with some hidden knowledge, when they're just people. Sometimes really fucking stupid people who happen to have a profitable talent. Next time some tries to sell you something or teach you something, ask yourself if this person is even an authority/knowledgeable on what they're talking about. I've gotten in the habit of mentally going "and you are?" when I get new information. Sometimes you find our that person is a leader in their field. Sometimes it's just some terminally online teenager.

Hotter Take: I think black people put too much stock in celebrities and what they'll do for the black community. You don't get freakishly wealthy being a sweetheart. Jay Z is not going to save us. And our blind loyalty has us supporting subpar performances and people because we "have to support" and it keeps fucking us over. No, I'm not supporting this business just because it's black owned if the service/quality sucks (especially since black owned goods tend to be more expensive).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I think black people put too much stock in celebrities and what they’ll do for the black community.

Nah deadass. Black capitalists have done nothing but mislead ever since Sean Carter put a sixth zero next to his net worth; and that goes the same for Sean Combs(who is in SO much legal hot water I expect him to boil by the end of the month), for Beyoncé, for Rihanna, for Michael Render, all of 'em. Black capitalism is just minstrelry and misleadership; and Black Excellence™ is just Talented Tenth-assed classism with a fresh coat of paint.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Most drugs should be over-the-counter. The especially dangerous or addictive ones maybe just require counselling with a pharmacist first. But I'm more concerned about people not able to access the medication they need than I am about idiots removing themselves from the gene pool by OD.

People in my dumbass country would rather 10 people with a genuine medical need suffer as long as 1 addict can't get a fix, and it's so many layers of bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If you think otc drugs are expensive now, waitl the scheduled narcotics find their way into the open market

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

there's not really a way to know for sure but I imagine the price would actually come down somewhat due to removal of red tape and paperwork associated with drug control

possibly also from increased competition if that made it easier for a drug manufacturer to begin producing previously controlled drugs

for example amphetamine salt production is capped by the US DEA. if that cap were removed the supply would increase and the price might very well decrease

sadly this is largely useless speculation

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 hours ago

Personally i hope it stays that way. There are enough legal ways to lose ones mind and life

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Fediverse is not for everyone and I'd rather not have fediverse go mainstream, and if it does I'd rather have normies use normie instances like lemmy.world and mastodon.social because that way you can filter them out if you don't like them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Me tossing leftovers in the trash does not in any way interfere with hungry people getting food.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Especially if that's food that's going to negatively impact your own health, like junk food.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

true. but next time, just buy/make less food.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 53 minutes ago

because the excess is going to waste. why do you think ? sure, it doesnt directly affect hungry people, however:

  1. it is expensive
  2. it is increasing demand for food, raising the price
  3. if the food is still good, you can give it to someone who will appreciate it

is it so hard to simply buy an appropriate amount of food ? or just eating the leftovers ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If for no other reason, then in the name of your own bank account.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

My bank account’s biggest limitation is my brain cycles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

more relatable than I wish it was.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Children should not be exposed to advertising at a young age (below 11/12 years old)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

that wouldnt account for leap days tho :/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

How about: (334/365 .. 335/366) years

load more comments
view more: next ›