this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
175 points (95.8% liked)

World News

31446 readers
709 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

Listen to me Jack, and listen carefully. This is why you can't have free healthcare biden-troll

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm gonna cleanse you in nuclear hellfire, Jack brandon

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Wasn't the point of hypersonic missiles being that they are so fast, and can make small course changes that make intercepts impossible due to the time between it happening and when an interceptor reacts?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It is easier to intercept an intercontinental ballistic missile and the US still doesn't have ICBM interception technology.

Good luck.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Except ... they do. Since 2020

I'm not saying in actual use it's reliable, but then again that's true of every country's ICBC interception capabilities. Missile guidance tech is one of the things the USA has an edge in.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It isnt reliable. That's the point. Also, note that it isn't for ICBMs, but short and mid range BMs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What? USA has been able to do that for decades

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago

Not reliably. If it was reliable at any point the US would have used nukes on someone else by now.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

"Could" doing lots of work here

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Let's just copy the Japanese rail system instead...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Could

lenin-sure They will likely come up with some no-bid sweetheart deal between numerous military-industrial complex grifters and make silly shit that can't operate in the rain or that requires a new paint job every time it's turned on.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Riiiight, you're going to build a thing that presumably goes mach 10 which can shoot other things moving at mach 10

Biden is slowly just morphing into Reagan

Call it Star Wars Joe!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Riiiight, you're going to build a thing that presumably goes mach 10 which can shoot other things moving at mach 10

Biden is slowly just morphing into Reagan

Call it Star Wars Joe!

If it's laser-based (and it may have to be if it's going to intercept anything going that fast) it is the Star Wars thing all over again! freedom-and-democracy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Seems like a bit of a stretch if you're having trouble developing a normal hypersonic missle. Presumably, you'd need to make something faster and more agile.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd prefer if they'd build big ass robots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Kinda. I don't want a missile defense system I want Voltron!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Pissing off the rest of Asia in 3... 2... 1...

Japanese demilitarization post-WW2 kept relations stable and happy. What will this do?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Minovsky particles at combat density captain!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Maybe splitting the cost over two countries is worth it? Japan would benefit from decreasing the risk of hypersonics to US air craft carriers