this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
438 points (98.7% liked)

Linux

45573 readers
808 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Red Hat stops all upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, multimedia applications (namely totem, rhythmbox and sound-juicer) and libfprint/fprintd (hadess.net)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 141 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What you are referring to as Red Hat is in fact IBM/Red Hat, or as I've recently come to calling it, IBM + Red Hat

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 113 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What do you get when you merge a company with IBM?

IBM.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago

You get what you fuckin deserve!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Annoying commercials about "the cloud" and some robot they built 30 years ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 10 months ago (4 children)

All these corporations looking to kill off their own relevance. They all in the same death cult or something?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 10 months ago

Never forget, in a capitalist system, every firm will always eventually try to get as many people as possible, to pay as much as possible, for as little as possible.

Enshitification

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They all in the same death cult or something?

Yeah, capitalism it seems like.

I guess asking for sustainable business practices is too much to ask for from the system. "Sufficient" money is never good enough. Gotta try to get all the money, even if it means burning down everything one holds dear.

Hell, the system is literally willing to burn down the whole world in pursuit of more. The more you think about it, the more senseless it all becomes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

It's called enshittification - Cory Doctorow invented the term.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hope that backfire on IBM.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, it will but so slowly and further down the road, nobody at IBM will see the connection. When Fedora (or desktop Linux in general) will be slightly less appealing to people who in 10 years will become the decision makers at IT departments, it'll weaken the position of Linux and in turn the commercial support providers.

Guess, everyone who does not yet own a Steam Deck needs to get one because Valve seems to be the biggest commercial proponent of consumer GNU/Linux.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (4 children)

With redhat withdrawing from FOSS and Ubuntu making a sour flavor of Debian... I think it will either be debian or SUSE.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Debian is a community system. If we nees to support a corporation with our money, it is in SUSE that we must place our hope. Our hope that Linux in the Enterprise will be ruled by a moral corporation.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

If we nees to support a corporation with our money, it is in SUSE that we must place our hope.

SUSE fired almost all upstream contributors a decade or so ago. They used to employ 10-20 KDE developers, about the same number of GNOME developers, a bunch of OpenOffice developers (their Go-OO variant of OpenOffice served as base for LibreOffice), and maintained Mono. As much as I personally like openSUSE TW (IMO it's the best rolling release distribution), SUSE as a corporate entity is worse than Red Hat under IBM. If you think Red Hat under IBM is bad, look up what SUSE having been a Novell subsidiary and then getting sold two additional times did to them. Red Hat would need cancel upstream contributions for so much more to come down to the level of SUSE. A company looking for enterprise Linux support is still best served with Red Hat. Pretty much the entire competition was freeloading off Red Hat's work. After shutting down their entire desktop department, SUSE was left with a few packagers and two or so people who developed GNOME extensions.

As I wrote in another comment: The company most interested in helping out upstream projects with desktop focus is Valve, not only via their own developers but also by contracting Collabora and Blue Systems. Given how Valve's update cycle of SteamOS is, those contributions will mostly still land first in "regular" Linux distributions such as openSUSE TW or Fedora, though. It's a lucky coincidence that Valve developed and released Steam Deck but they are also mostly just interested in the plumbing and Plasma Desktop itself, not applications (unless it's about apps SteamOS developers use and they need to scratch their own itches though bug fixes). So Bluetooth an power management: sure. Music players: no.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Can you explain why "community system" is bad? Genuinely curious, since the word community sounds like it's not controlled by corpo interests

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Community systems are not bad, that's most of Linux, but there needs to be an ethical, FOSS-friendly enterprise system to get corpos invested in Linux and FOSS. Besides, corporate systems usually have massive dev teams and upstream/open-source a lot of their work. As much as I shit on Canonical and Red Hat, they've done immense amounts of beneficial work for Linux and FOSS.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That makes sense, thank you. My question above was specifically about Debian, since I've heard the point of it being community based used negatively in other places/threads too.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I didn't mean it in a negative light. The issue is that companies prefer to trust other companies, which is why it's good to have a moral company to point to.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

It's not bad but companies like someone to talk to/blame when something goes wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 10 months ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

this is bad

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

Thanks for linking the actual article!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Honestly, they just keep lowering the value paying them brings. Execs barely want to pay them in the first place, why would I as the engineer or IT solutioner care about putting money towards support if they keep abandoning projects...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 10 months ago

Farewell, Red Hat. Thanks for all your good work throughout the years. Sucks you sold out to IBM

[–] [email protected] 45 points 10 months ago (2 children)

These kind of changes are absolutely infuriating, and what's even worse, is that there's nothing we can do about it

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

and what’s even worse, is that there’s nothing we can do about it

Look I know it's much easier said than done, but you can choose to walk away from IBM and Red Hat over this. If these changes start to lose money, they'll respond. Otherwise they'll see how much abuse their customers are willing to put up with and start doubling down.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean that Fedora users should question if they want to keep using this distro? Because I do use Fedora, and I understand I'm "beta-testing" an enterprise product, but yeah, for me this changes my "relationship" with Red Hat. Or what do you mean?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I just don't want folks thinking they're trapped, because that's when a vendor will really start putting the screws to you.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Don't use Fedora or it's ilk for starters.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, Fedora and Gnome were embraced and extended by IBM.

You know what's next now.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yep, Ubuntu will fork all of these, then trash them, introduce their alternatives, then drop support in 5 years.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Introducing unity 2

[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What a weird thing to do. Ever since I saw someone use it, I've always considered putting Fedora on my professional machine rather than Ubuntu with all the snaps neutered. Fedora has been the "Linux if you want to use it for realsies" distro for me, while Ubuntu has become the "Linux if your grandma still wants to use her old laptop" distro.

I suppose IBM is making Redhat focus on extracting money from CentOS. It's sad to see, really.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This was my thought exactly. Work is a RHEL shop and I had settled on Fedora after distro hopping. Ubuntu was for the new guys getting into Linux.

My self hosted services were all CentOS and more recently Rocky/Alma. After the shenanigans RH pulled to make their source harder to obtain, I'm working through my personal ansible scripts to get up on Debain. I'll never go back to RHEL or the forks.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Fedora is freaking amazing. Fresh & stable software, super clean UI, huge community...

Debian has stable but old software (kernel and packages), clean UI, huge community. But it's harder to use, since you have to make a few more manual steps to leave it at where Fedora comes as default.

Fedora will always have a place as long as Red Hat stops shitting on it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Welp.. Gnome will lost many of their contributor/maintainer.. Well, at least KDE folks is backed by Novell(SUSE) and XFCE is purely maintained by community already. It seems Linux desktop is still safe. lol

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

SUSE was an independent company before, during, and after its 5 years under Novell. That's a weird attribution to Novell when SUSE has always been the contributing company to Linux.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Oh, sorry.. I thought they are one from the start.. thx for correcting me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

But this was it's year!

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Corpo shills were never on the team pleb... just so happened it was good for them to do something that benefited FOSS. Now that is over, it seems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

power-profiles-daemon is now archived? Dammit, that was a big one for Fedora.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am a little concerned to step in front of the hate machine here but this feels like a continued move away from app dev to more infrastructural stuff as previously announced by them. If so, I am all for it as not everybody is going to use Rhythmbox or LibreOffice but we can all use HDR and other core tech that Red Hat will develop instead. They are one of the few Linux companies that can fund these large, technical projects. Having them working on apps feels like a waste of their engineering potential.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But if they are moving towards infrastructure I doubt HDR will be on their radar - or any desktop related technology for that matter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well, The Enterprise Linux war is just getting better and better!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

why did you link to a kbin view of another post right here on [email protected] ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

There is no Way this is going to improve anything Red Hat's side

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can someone tell me what this means for fedora?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Very little I suspect. These specific packages may evolve less quickly but will still be available. None of them were Fedora specific.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Let's hope the community will pick these up or some of the distro's like Ubuntu, Mint etc

load more comments
view more: next ›