23
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Bunch of BRICS countries arent democratic themselves, not to speak of their new additions.

The whole BRICS conference didnt allow journalist questions

[-] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

I'm sorry, what? Are they defining "democratic" to mean that each government has a say, regardless of how democratic that government itself actually is?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sanctions and wide spread use off the of the dollar needs to be addressed in a global democratic fashion. The USA hasn't resembled anything near democratic for a bit, yet kill innocent citizens globally in the name of democracy. In the same way each vote should mean something in a democratic country, each country should have a say in what takes place globally. Makes sense when they're orchestrating multipolar international rule.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

The USA hasn’t resembled anything near democratic for a bit

What fantasy land are you living in?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Russia, probably.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

No, really. America has fucked up their democracy... It started good, for sure, but it keeps getting eroded (unrealistic time constraints, arbitrary boundaries and silly vetoes or weightings). I'm just sitting from the hip here, certainly no expert

[-] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Only white male landowners could vote when it started

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

US democracy is flawed but still stronger than most BRICS countries. Maybe all of them.

There are many shades of gray on the slide to authoritarianism.

This headline is strange. It doesn’t seem to be a quote that I can find, and none of the proposed policies really would involve more global democracy. They are mostly aimed at increasing the influence of BRICS countries at the expense of the US and its allies.

Giving more of the world’s population a greater say in global governance and decision-making is a great idea. But unfortunately there really is no one trying to push for such a thing currently.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

We can call it The Democratic People's Republic of Earth.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Yes, the author chose that word and the content of the article suggests it's meant as respecting countries' sovereignty and reducing the concentration of global political power.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Democracy with Chinese characteristics they meant.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Democracy without dissent. China has achieved peak democracy. Once you mercilessly crush all opposition, your population becomes completely unified and elections are easy, straightforward affairs! The one secret of success that western democracies don't want you to know!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Belt Road Initiative of China, Stupid

It’s another means for china to have influence

China is far from Democratic

Countries that have fallen for belt and road have already or will regret it

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I'm sure Russia and China have the perfect democracy in mind.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

The role of democracy is to make government responsible to its constituents rather than to the rulers: democracy was founded on the idea that the monarchy fucking sucks and wealth/power should be better distributed.

China's government is still accountable to its constituents, just in a different way than the US. Instead of winning and losing elections, getting increased or reduced responsibilities (promotion and demotion) is the primary way of managing accountability. The primary failure mode of China's government is rampant corruption that decouples the promotion/demotion mechanism from actual constituent well-being, which is why stopping that is the platform that Xi Jinping rose to power on.

People always talk about civil liberties in China, but frankly Asian culture is notoriously conservative. LGBT rights are still an active topic across East and Southeast Asia (and indeed even in the US). Religious freedoms are just... not really a big concern when most of your population isn't religious. Freedom of speech exists up until they begin calling for government reform/replacement: protests are a dominant form of expressing displeasure to local and municipal governments (the Jasic workers protest was quelled, but the company was punished by government policy that fucked their short-term growth prospects), and can even influence national politics (see the protests against COVID-19 lockdowns and the resultant opening of policy on COVID-19). The War On Terror rears it's head in ugly ways, but all indigenous minorities get handled with affirmative action policies that encourage economic independence.

Getting over the great firewall is fairly trivial in practice, particularly for the young and tech savvy. The prevalence of studying (4.4 million students) and travel abroad (who the fuck knows) makes it even more trivial to learn and spread news from other perspectives. Activism is prosecuted a fair chunk more, but it's not like activists in the West are given carte blanche either.

Is it less progressive than urban West Coast/Northeast US? Absolutely. Is the government as accountable as in democracies like the Nordic states or Switzerland? Absolutely not. Then again, you wouldn't expect it to be. Chinese culture is far closer to that of right-wing America (without the bible thumping and gun toting lol) than it is to that of left-wing America, nevermind left-wing Europe.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Is the government as accountable as in democracies like the Nordic states or Switzerland?

Bruv everyone in Norway wanted 10 politicians jailed last year. All that came from it was memes about how "I'm sorry I didn't know corruption was illegal" is a laughable excuse and then it was memory-holed. The only person punished was one of the journalists and they shuffled some things around to reduce transparency. One criminal resigned but she got an emotional distress payout and is still at AP.

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
23 points (81.1% liked)

World News

31441 readers
923 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS