this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
65 points (79.8% liked)

Memes

44124 readers
2133 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is that Matt Walsh? Great documentary, frustrating to watch, but great

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I mean great in what way? Great at looking into the empty mind of a conservative grifter? The scene of that researcher trying to explain the intricacies of gender identity and expression, and Matt Walsh zoning out to classical music will be stuck with me forever

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Great as in nicely edited, compelling in a Michael Moore way. I just rewatched it and think I know which scene you mean. They could've left more of his contortions in, fair enough, but he gets an awful lot of airtime besides. How is Walsh a grifter? I only know him from this documentary and the interview that led me to it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

IMO those researchers should be able to easily explain what is a woman or any of those asked definitions, but somehow they are just stuck in a loop of a circular definitions... thats pretty much says to me, they are no researchers but charlatans...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And you would be wrong. It's almost impossible to narrow down a definition to something that includes everything that is, and excludes everything that isn't. The entire point behind gender identity and expression is that human beings are extremely complex, and the things we attribute to biological sex are almost all sociologically constructed. Trying to rigidly define a woman will inevitably exclude those who even conservatives would consider traditionally consider woman. As such, a deep look into gender theory is needed to understand how we categorize people into different genders.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Thats not true.

The entirety of sciences is based on generalizations of stuff by their common denominating parameters, despite the outliers. This includes chemistry, physics,...

Generally in biology, the female are usually characterized as the sex producing immobile ova and the males producing mobile sperm. The outliers, which due to some mutation or other reason doesnt fit that description, doesnt change the definition, they are simply described as outliers.

Its now also indicated by studies, that those intersex outliers in humans are mostly caused by endocrine disruptors during pregnancy but also during later life: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.4137/EHI.S39825

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

It's cringe :(

load more comments
view more: next ›