RvTV95XBeo

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

capture the generated codes and time of input in some way, then brute force hashes until they generate one that produces the correct codes at x time

Given a TOTP key is usually at least 18 characters for a 6-digit code, having only one data point sticks you with something on the order of 10^28 possible keys for a given singular code (way more if case sensitive). You'd need to be regularly intercepting TOTP codes to brute force your way to the right key, and even then it'd only be valid for a single site. At that point it probably means you've fully compromised the connecting device or server, at which point, why do you even need the TOTP again?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Great insight, really contributing to the community

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Hundreds is a tragic number, and I don't want to minimize that loss and the impacts on their loved ones, but hundreds could be only like... One plane.

Again, tragic, but if you're telling me one plane might crash at some arbitrary point in the future, out of the thousands of daily flights around the globe, I'm not dropping everything to go stand in that picket line

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Google Keep

My wife and I use it all the time for things like grocery lists, packing lists, etc. It's nice to be an able to collaborate in real time on a checklist, and I haven't found an app that can replicate that convenience.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago (11 children)

Hard to argue something isn't an objectively huge advantage to your business if you're spending $10b for it.

My only fear in all of this is we may get monkey pawed - if Google stops paying for placement, Firefox loses 90% of its revenue, and the anti-trust case may further cement Chrome/Chromium monopoly.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Here's an article about the subject, paper linked at the bottom of the article: https://phys.org/news/2010-12-high-speed-pollute-percent-traditional.html

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

It's more than that - doubling air resistance only doubles the energy use if it's the only inefficiency on the train (e.g., no losses in the magnets, HVAC, lighting, etc.). Add onto that the fact that you're basically eliminating rolling resistance from traditional trains when switching to maglev, and the expected outcome should be much less than double.

Finally, the most important part, each high speed rail route of any meaningful distance has the opportunity to displace a certain amount of air travel, so big picture, HSR results in a significant decrease in overall energy consumption.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Huge props to Mozilla on this one - their article is clear and thorough. A lot of the studies are very vague, limited in scope, or way too technical, which makes them hard to share and discuss broadly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

This can't be true, as the real method is to plug your nose, look at the ceiling and drink out of the left side of a cup.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

This in a nutshell.

I snagged a domain I'm really happy with, but because it's not a .net or .com, I'd say like 20% of forms do not accept it as a "valid" input, so I have to have a backup.

view more: ‹ prev next ›