[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'd be interested, too, if he and FUTO got to terms with their community and if they learned how licensing and trademarks work... Last thing I remember he claimed lots if things that weren't true. And FUTO didn't really address anything.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Seems the two German supermarket chains really like to have the same infrastructure everywhere. Everywhere I go the Aldis look exactly the same. They have slightly different products depending on the country. But the price tags, interior, ... is basically the same. Okay and we don't have "Flaschenpfand" everywhere... (deposit on the plastic bottles and the machines where you can return bottles.) I bet all of this makes it a lot easier for their techs and management. And it could also explain why they sometimes redo a store that still looks fine and fit it with the latest shenanigans.

And as an aside: I've shopped in the first Aldi store ever. It's not far from where I live.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

They're already widely adopted in supermarkets here (Germany).

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, you'd damage the car's electrical system. First of all it's not designed to feed in energy through that outlet. It's made to output energy.

And most importantly: 24V is way too much. 2 times the intended voltage would fry most electronics. Your stereo, the power steering, airbags, ... There is a good margin and car electronics are designed to be pretty robust, but you're pushing it.

I think they're still fine because what happens is your car battery absorbs that extra voltage. But it's really dangerous. On a sunny day you'll charge your car battery beyond the 14V or so the chemistry can handle. And at that point it'll degrade fast. The acid in there is going to start to boil, producing hydrogen, so in addition to a destroyed battery, you're in for a small explosion if you're very unlucky. And once the battery is gone it'll start frying the cars electronics because now there isn't anything keeping the voltage down.

Get a switch that exclusively connects either the car or the solar panel to the bluetti. One switch that switches between two things, not an On/Off switch. And make sure it's rated for the current.

Edit: Or a relais that toggles between both. It can switch if there's power on the 12V rail, and connect the bluetti to either or.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Those top level domains aren't set in stone. The majority of TLDs can be used by anyone. It's more what kind of image you want for your company/project. Lots of open-source projects have .org domains or .io

But you can choose whatever you like. Even a country domain is okay. But I personally wouldn't choose .com for something open source. Look at the prices and go for .org unless that's substantially more expensive with your registrar. (My opinion.)

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I wonder if experiences from 12 years ago and numbers from 8 years ago still hold true as of today.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Idk, a plant? a nintendo emulator? enlighten me...

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I see Github as a mere tool. As I could use a proprietary operating system like Windows on my development computer, I can use Github to distribute the code. It doesn't have that severe consequence to the open source project itself and works well. And it's relatively transparent. Users can view issues etc without submitting to Microsoft. And it's been the standard for quite some time.

I'm far more concerned with FLOSS projects using platforms like Discord, which forces their users to surrender their privacy and that actively contribute to the enshittification of the internet. I wouldn't want to be part of that.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think that's a good question. And a nice video. The findings in the paper seem to arrive at that conclusion and we might need to find a better approach. Mind that (as he pointed out) it doesn't rule out growth in AI. It just hints at probable stagnation with the current methods. I'm already fascinated by the current tech and the new possibilities. But AI is really hyped as of now and I too, think we should take the claims of the big AI companies with a grain of salt. I'm sure the scientists at OpenAI are already concerned with exactly this as they do research for the next generations of ChatGPT. It's a bit of a bummer that lots of the research get's done behind closed curtains and we're going to have to wait for a bit longer to find out.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's a shame that nowadays everything "needs" a phone number. I just put in a proper prefix code and then all zeroes as a number if some company forces me to. That works for some of the websites. Some stores even print that on a shipping label. So it might supposedly be there for a reason. But I've never heard this helps if a parcel gets lost or something. They won't call anyways and the real reason is they can store it in some database and depending on the exact business do all kinds of other stuff with it.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Seems in this case they got own domains and independent stores.

And Aliexpress and Temu are very different. Aliexpress seems to be a halfway decent platform. Never had any major issues with them, except what's to be expected when importing stuff from China. I think it's very similar to ordering the same thing on eBay.

Temu isn't. That platform is made to harvest data and prey on their "customers".

And I can't comment on Wish. I haven't been interested in cheap crap.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hmm, I think summarization is a bad example. I've read quite some AI summaries that miss the point, sum up to a point where the simplification makes sth wrong or the AI added things or paraphrased and made things at least ambiguous. Even with the state of the art tech. Especially if the original texts were condensed or written by professionals. Like scientific papers or good news articles...

What I think works better are tasks like translating text. That works really well. Sometimes things like rewording text. Or the style-transfer the image generators can do. That's impressive. Restoring old photos, coloring them or editing something in/out. I also like the creativity they provide me with. They can come up with ideas, flesh out my ideas.

I think AI is an useful tool for tasks like that. But not so much for summarization or handling factual information. I don't see a reason why further research coudn't improve on that... But at the current state it's just the wrong choice of tools.

And sure, it doesn't help that people hype AI and throw it at everything.

view more: next ›

h3ndrik

joined 1 year ago