leo85811nardo

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

The fact that my game throttles when windows does update in the background as it pleases is enough reason

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I agree. Competitive games just bring the toxicity out of me. Plus, all the skill gained will become nothing one day with a balance patch just because the devs and publishers want to "keep the game live for longer"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

sudo provides sudoedit or sudo -e which allows me to use vim with my user configuration btw

[–] [email protected] 109 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

In my opinion, it's bad either way for different reasons

If they do tell the difference, then there is some tracking built into the machine that runs the engine, which is bad for the application user

If they don't tell the difference, then there will be exploits for intentionally reinstall multiple times, which is bad for the application developers

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I believe apt has the ability to "redirect" or "inform" the user on prompt. They could just show a message that says it's no longer available for this LTS version, and let them use snap or flatpak instead

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

For me it's the fact that Ubuntu forcefully shove snap into my system when I want the normal deb install with apt. I'm sure snap has gone better over the years but this is something that I absolutely hate. When I want to use snap/flatpak, I can use snap/flatpak install, and when I say apt install it should be deb install as it's supposed to be as a Debian variant. Linux tools has always been known for doing exactly what is told, whereas what Ubuntu is recently doing is the opposite of it