New Labour despite being dipshits did increase social spending including education during 2000 to 2008, just imagine how much higher with something a bit more proper
tintory
The part of population decline isn’t good if it’s cause is people unable to afford homes or stagnate wages.
Hell, in the UK Birthrates plummeted because of the sheer damage Tories have caused us since they took over in 2008
It's pretty clear, after all broken clocks are right twice a day
In Contrast: Israel, Czech, Georgia, France, etc all support egg freezing and IVF
Nah, Tarzan was too weak as a human to get a mate
- You are correct that material costs need to be addressed, and children are pretty much exotic pets
- According to the article and google translating the links clicking around, many of them pay off medical copays, childcare services, and other costs. Not to mention this quote saying that local family policy is at best temporary without more national spending
The proactive strategies from these cities offer Japan a lifeline, providing a buffer without a comprehensive national policy and potential synergy if one is implemented.
Don’t insult God like that! h He have standards
The article talks about a study showing that housing prices won’t be affordable for current generations and express it’s a bad thing because of it hurts those generations causing a rise of mental illness and unmet family goals
How is that absurd?
Felt like people aren’t talking about the IMF forcing austerity on Argentina
It's not like the CPC ever screwed an ally when trading in yuan.
cough Russia cough
Yes, as I call them dipshits
and I pointed out 00's New Labour increased social spending, and British TFR can be even higher with a party that's proper left instead of New Labour's dipshit right