wischi

You can sure it's end to end encrypted because the client can be analyzed to verify that claim.

How about a real desk 🤣

So now you are trying to use the Tanner scale to determine if somebody is an adult? There is no strawman here, you are writing those ridiculous comments yourself.

That's not how any of this works.

So a 13 year old person is an adult? I can see how that opinion is unpopular because it's just wrong.

What could go wrong.

Of couse all the others are odd because otherwise they wouldn't be prime. All primes after three are also not divisible by three... "magic". The only difference is that there are is no word like "even" or "odd" for "divisible by three" or "not divisible by three".

It's not unheard of no, but if you have to rule out two for some reason it's because of some other arbitrary choice. In the first instance (haven't yet looked at the second and third one) it has to do with the fact that a sum of "two" was chosen arbitrary. You can come up with other things that requires you to exclude primes up to five.

Many sensor are 3:2 or non trivial ratios because of how the color filter pattern is aligned. Why do you think the sensors are 4:3?

"even" just means divisible by two. So it's not unique at all. Two is the only prime that's ~~even~~ divisible by two and three is the only prime that's divisible by three. You just think two is a special prime because there is a word for "divisible by two" but the prime two isn't any more special or unique in any meaningful way than any other prime.

Wow that was fast I just edited my previous comment and you probably mean "1 and prime numbers" by numberphile with james grime.

Any examples? Sounds like you mean the reason why one is excluded from the primes because of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.