What is the company's incentive to make the package bigger than it needs to be?
Shipping costs come two fold... Weight and number of pallets. Weight change is negligible here, but the amount of air they need to ship will increase. They are incentivized to reduce it to a minimum to save on shelf, storage, and distribution costs.
But in the morning? He's making waffles.
Makes his transmission moen
I really enjoyed sitting out on Suomenlinna drinking long drink while chilling on the rocks.
Utter contentment and peace.
I think it's great when people create a small business and are successful. But I roll my eyes when they have a business with 20 employees and put their title as President & CEO on shit like linkedin. Just put owner. Or managing partner.
TFW 911 leaves you on read
Think there's a significant population that only browses, emails, and does office suite tasks. IPads are serious alternatives if they get annoyed enough with MS.
They're not primed to move to linux as they're not "techie" enough.
Their biggest threat will be losing customers to ipad pro, imo.
maybe her physical strength is the direct product of being born into wealth and having the time to get ripped?
GTA. I was driving down the road and had the urge/intrusive thought to side swipe a motorcycle because hitting them is just what you do in the game.
I noted how it was weird the first time, then it occured again a week later. That was the last day I played GTA even though I enjoyed the game.
I don't agree with the can example. Those are physically smaller and lack meaningful slack fill.
Your points stand for the first purchase. After that people will know the proportion of chip to air, and be annoyed by it. If they could do a bag smaller with minimal chip breakage and less air they would both succeed at getting more bags out per pallet and be lauded for not cheating people by selling air.
The slack fill is functional, and I don't see much incentive to over do it.