this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
954 points (98.6% liked)

Memes

44124 readers
1978 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Well, it is true. Most people don’t want to work. I certainly wouldn’t if I could help it.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yeah. Me too. You would literally have to give me money, for me to sacrifice a part of my chilling out time.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

hear me out... what about more money? that do anything for ya?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

And this is “hypothetical”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So just the promise of more money?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

So RSUs & SARs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The notion that more is better than less has been a dominant paradigm in various fields of inquiry, from economics to psychology. However, this paradigm has been challenged by recent philosophical developments that question the validity and applicability of this assumption. I have examined the arguments for and against the traditional paradigm of more versus less, and explored some of the exceptional cases that defy this binary opposition. In order to reconcile these conflicting perspectives and provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between larger and smaller quantities, further research is still required.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The world may never know... Or, at least the wealthy won't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

In Texas they’ve solved the problem by simply deciding that bigger is better and more is more. The rest of the world is still struggling with this conundrum, so the debate is far from over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And by part you mean 12 out of 24h

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Exactly. When I was a kid, my parents gave me a job at the family business. It was great, they said I could work half days. I could do whatever i wanted with the other 12 hours.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

My current deal says 7.5 h and I’m quite happy with that. If I get a better offer, I may reconsider.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Can't say I've been missing it, Bob!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

And that should be the goal of a society. Currently we work because as individuals we're forced to. As humanity we're already past the forced need. Enabling people to choose would be more beneficial and we have the innate quality of finding meaningful ways to spend our time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that we suck at allocating productivity. For example, we produce enough food for everyone but don't distribute it half as well as we should, so people still starve while food rots somewhere else. We waste resources propping up a whole host of parasites that add no value to society, such as famous-for-being-famous celebrities, advertisers, speculators and redundant managers, while underpaying the people who actually produce wealth. And we want a brand new iPhone every year, a brand new car every two years, etc, and by and large don't recycle. We're wasteful.

Most of the actually important and time-consuming work is automated already. If we were smart about what work we do, an 8-hour work week for everyone would be more than possible. But we are so inefficient with our productivity due to warped priorities that most of us barely scrape by as it is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Our excessive lack of proper planning and foresight really gets accentuated when you evaluate how wasteful and inefficient any of our processes are. I’ve been listening to Walden on audiobook recently, it’s almost as if Thoreau really did transcend his time and saw that the future would be equally as futile as his present at properly providing for humanity in a meaningful way.

We would rather have luxuries and pleasures than fulfilling proper needs, work tends to take away from our needs in ways we overlook.