154
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 62 points 1 month ago

EoL

released 10 weeks ago

Linux kernel any%

[-] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As there are LTS branches, currently 5.4, 5.10, 5.15, 6.1 and 6.6 which will get updates until Decembre 2025/2026, I don't see the problem.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

And the older they are the less secure they are. LTS are not as great as people think. https://ciq.com/blog/why-a-frozen-linux-kernel-isnt-the-safest-choice-for-security/

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago

The article is about frozen vendor kernels, not about.LTS

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

Two different things. LTS kernels get security patches until their support is dropped.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah that's the whole point of LTS, so it stays compatible with that kernel version but still gets important updates, but no feature updates

[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago

These messages are damn useless

Distros take care of the kernel, either ship LTS releases or do the backports themselves. Only rolling release people run that kernel.

So this post is literally only useful for the 4 LFS users that now need to recompile their kernels.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

You never have to update if you never connect to the internet.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Stuxnet would like a chat with you

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

Weren't are nukes controlled by IBM series/1 systems and floppy discs until 2019. They said they upgraded to a highly secure solid state system. They might be still using those computers for some parts of the system because “You can't hack something that doesn't have an IP address. It's a very unique system — it is old and it is very good.”

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I like to see what's in the newer kernels and know to expect an update that might break my dkms modules in the near future

[-] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Feels like Linux 4.20 wasn't that long ago and we're already at Linux 6.9? At this rate Sex 2 will release and it won't even be exciting

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

It does feel that way, but...

"Linux 4.20 was released on Sun, 23 Dec 2018"

About 5.5 years.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

(6.9-4.2)/(2024-2018) = 0.45 "version increments" per year.

4.2/(2018-1991) = 0.15 "version increments" per year.

So, the pace of version increases in the past 6 years has been around triple the average from the previous 27 years, since Linux' first release.

I guess I can see why 6.9 would seem pretty dramatic for long-time Linux users.

I wonder whether development has actually accelerated, or if this is just a change in the approach to the release/versioning process.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

I wonder if development has actually accelerated, or if this is just a change in the approach to the release/versioning process

Both.

Development has increased, but you should use your comparison from the last 2.6 release.

It stayed on 2.6.y for 8 years - that was where it got stable enough that there wasn’t some major milestone to use as a new marker for its update number

There are cool new features, but if it followed the old versioning scheme, we’d still be on 2.6 because it hasn’t (intentionally) broken the API between the kernel and userspace

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Since version 4.0 the version numbers have nothing to do with changes and are strictly time based. Linux 5.0 happened after Linux 4.20 because Linus "ran out of hands and toes to count on", same thing with 6.0 after 5.19

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wait. He lost a finger or toe???

Edit: more seriously it’s been since 3.0 after being on 2.6 forever

there are no special landmark features or incompatibilities related to the version number change, it's simply a way to drop an inconvenient numbering system

It used to only get bumped after a major new feature update, but it was stable enough at 2.6 that it got stuck there for 8 years, so he switched to a different update number

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

We run production loads on 2.6 kernel. Please don't ask questions.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

Meanwhile Ubuntu:

[-] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago

Is there any particular reason this is news? I thought that's how most kernel updates went for the non-LTS releases. Or has something changed? What's different compared to all other kernel updates in rolling releases?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

Are Linux kernel lifespans usually that short?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

Yes, usual releases are supported ~ 3 months, LTS versions get support for a much longer period e.g. 6.6 for 3 y, 6.1 for 4 y, 5.15 for 5 y or 5.10 for 6 y.

this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
154 points (97.0% liked)

Linux

45443 readers
1127 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS